Dismiss Notice

Welcome To CK5!

Registering is free and easy! Hope to see you on the forums soon.

Score a FREE t-shirt and membership sticker when you sign up for a Premium Membership and choose the recurring plan.

Ann Coulters Editorial that USA Today wouldn't Print

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by Stickseler, Jul 26, 2004.

  1. Stickseler

    Stickseler 3/4 ton status

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2001
    Posts:
    6,503
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Ann Coulters Editorial that USA Today wouldn\'t Print

    This thing is a Riot...Wonder why they wouldn't print it /forums/images/graemlins/histerical.gif /forums/images/graemlins/histerical.gif /forums/images/graemlins/histerical.gif /forums/images/graemlins/histerical.gif

    Put the speakers in a cage

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Posted: July 26, 2004
    4:15 p.m. Eastern


    © 2004 WorldNetDaily.com


    Here at the Spawn of Satan convention in Boston, conservatives are deploying a series of covert signals to identify one another, much like gay men do. My allies are the ones wearing crosses or American flags. The people sporting shirts emblazoned with the "F-word" are my opponents. Also, as always, the pretty girls and cops are on my side, most of them barely able to conceal their eye-rolling.

    Democrats are constantly suing and slandering police as violent, fascist racists – with the exception of Boston's police, who'll be lauded as national heroes right up until the Democrats pack up and leave town on Friday, whereupon they'll revert to their natural state of being fascist, racist pigs.

    A speaker at the Democratic National Convention this year, Al Sharpton, accused white police officers of raping and defacing Tawana Brawley in 1987, lunatic charges that eventually led to a defamation lawsuit against Sharpton, and even more eventually to Sharpton paying a jury award to the defamed plaintiff Steve Pagones. So it's a real mystery why cops wouldn't like Democrats.

    As for the pretty girls, I can only guess that it's because liberal boys never try to make a move on you without the U.N. Security Council's approval. Plus, it's no fun riding around in those dinky little hybrid cars. My pretty-girl allies stick out like a sore thumb amongst the corn-fed, no make-up, natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie-chick pie wagons they call "women" at the Democratic National Convention.

    Apparently, the nuts at the Democratic National Convention are going to be put in cages outside the convention hall. Sadly, they won't be fighting to the death as is done in W.W.F. caged matches. They're calling this the "protestor's area," although I suppose a better name would be the "truth-free zone."

    I thought this was a great idea until I realized the "nut" category did not include Sharpton, Al Gore, Bill Clinton and Teddy Kennedy – all featured speakers at the convention. I'd say the actual policy is only untelegenic nuts get the cages, but little Dennis Kucinich is speaking at the Convention, too. So it must be cages for "nuts who have not run for president as serious candidates for the Democratic Party."

    Looking at the line-up of speakers at the Convention, I have developed the 7-11 challenge: I will quit making fun of, for example, Dennis Kucinich, if he can prove he can run a 7-11 properly for 8 hours. We'll even let him have an hour or so of preparation before we open up. Within 8 hours, the money will be gone, the store will be empty, and he'll be explaining how three 11-year olds came in and asked for the money and he gave it to them.

    For 20 years, the Democrats wouldn't let Jimmy Carter within 100 miles of a Convention podium. The fact that Carter is now their most respectable speaker tells you where that party is today. Maybe they just want to remind Americans who got us into this Middle East mess in the first place. We've got millions of fanatical Muslims trying to slaughter Americans while shouting "Allah Akbar!" Yeah, let's turn the nation over to these guys.

    With any luck, Gore will uncork his speech comparing Republicans to Nazis. Just a few weeks ago, Gore gave a speech accusing the Bush administration of deploying "digital Brown Shirts" to intimidate journalists and pressure the media into writing good things about Bush – in case you were wondering where all those glowing articles about Bush were coming from.

    The last former government official to slake his thirst so deeply with the Kool-Aid and become a far-left peacenik was Ramsey Clarke and it took him a few years to really blossom. Clinton must have done some number on Gore. Then again, with his yen for earth tones in a man's wardrobe, maybe Gore's references to "Brown Shirts" was intended as a compliment.

    Only one major newspaper – the Boston Herald – reported Gore's "Brown Shirt" comment, though a Bush campaign spokesman's statement quoting the "Brown Shirt" line made it into the very last sentence of a Los Angeles Times article. The New York Times responded with an article criticizing "both" Republicans and Democrats for using Nazi imagery. Democrats call Republicans Nazis, the Republicans quote the Democrats calling Republicans Nazis and "both" are using Nazi imagery. (It's a cycle of violence!)

    The nuts in the cages are virtual Bertrand Russells compared to the official speakers at the Democratic Convention. On the basis of their placards, I gather the caged-nut position is that they love the troops so much, they don't want them to get hurt defending America from terrorist attack. "Support the troops," the signs say, "bring them home."

    That's my new position on all government workers, except the 5 percent who aren't useless, which is to say cops, prosecutors, firemen and U.S. servicemen. I love bureaucrats at the National Endowment of the Arts funding crucifixes submerged in urine so much – I think they should go home. I love public school teachers punishing any mention of God and banning Christmas songs so much – I think they should go home.

    Walking back from the convention site, I chatted with a normal Bostonian for several blocks – who must have identified me through our covert system of signals. He was mostly bemused by the Democrats' primetime speakers and told me he used to be an independent, but for the last 20 years found himself voting mostly Republican. Then he corrected himself and said he votes for the "American."

    I'd say I love all these Democrats in Boston so much I want them to go home, but I don't. I want Americans to get a good long look at the French Party and keep the 7-11 challenge in mind.
     
  2. mtn. burb

    mtn. burb 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    May 13, 2004
    Posts:
    1,260
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Ojai Calif.
    Re: Ann Coulters Editorial that USA Today wouldn\'t Print

    Ann Coulters rocks! /forums/images/graemlins/woot.gif


    /forums/images/graemlins/usaflag.gif /forums/images/graemlins/usaflag.gif /forums/images/graemlins/usaflag.gif /forums/images/graemlins/usaflag.gif /forums/images/graemlins/usaflag.gif /forums/images/graemlins/usaflag.gif
    /forums/images/graemlins/usaflag.gif /forums/images/graemlins/usaflag.gif /forums/images/graemlins/usaflag.gif /forums/images/graemlins/usaflag.gif /forums/images/graemlins/usaflag.gif /forums/images/graemlins/usaflag.gif
     
  3. big pappa b

    big pappa b 3/4 ton status

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Posts:
    6,328
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Falcon, Colorado
    Re: Ann Coulters Editorial that USA Today wouldn\'t Print

    I don't get it...is she angry about something /forums/images/graemlins/rotfl.gif /forums/images/graemlins/rotfl.gif /forums/images/graemlins/rotfl.gif /forums/images/graemlins/rotfl.gif /forums/images/graemlins/rotfl.gif /forums/images/graemlins/rotfl.gif
     
  4. 1-ton

    1-ton 1/2 ton status Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Posts:
    2,882
    Likes Received:
    159
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Re: Ann Coulters Editorial that USA Today wouldn\'t Print

    So many of these political journalist from Ann Coulters and Rush Limbaugh to Al Franken and Michael Moore are just a bunch of hacks that only want to push peoples buttons on shallow issues like gays in the military.

    To me the real issues are the unaccounted $2 Trillion in tax dollars that are being funneled into private bank accounts by people in the pentagon, HUD, and IRS, or the fact that 25% of Americas economy is based on laundered drug money, tax money, and political donations, which go through banks like Citi Bank Corp, Bank of America, or Wells Fargo, and then into peoples private bank accounts to be spent on Yachts and Mansions. It is too bad people do not care about being swindled out of their hard earned money as much as they do about Gay Marriage, but that is what the Democrats and Republicans want.
     
  5. newyorkin

    newyorkin 1 ton status

    Joined:
    May 8, 2001
    Posts:
    16,555
    Likes Received:
    157
    Location:
    Los Estados Unitos
    Re: Ann Coulters Editorial that USA Today wouldn\'t Print

    Wha??? Where'd you hear that?
     
  6. Goober

    Goober 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2002
    Posts:
    2,222
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Mayberry (Auburn, WA)
    Re: Ann Coulters Editorial that USA Today wouldn\'t Print

    [ QUOTE ]
    To me the real issues are blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

    [/ QUOTE ]


    [​IMG]



    Sounds like you've been listening to one of those "hacks".
     
  7. behemoth

    behemoth 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Posts:
    1,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Northwest Florida
    Re: Ann Coulters Editorial that USA Today wouldn\'t Print

    "Ann Coulter" and "USA Today" in the sentence is an oxymoron - kinda like "military intelligence" or "jumbo shrimp". /forums/images/graemlins/histerical.gif

    Ann Coulter is good!! /forums/images/graemlins/bow.gif
     
  8. 1-ton

    1-ton 1/2 ton status Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Posts:
    2,882
    Likes Received:
    159
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Re: Ann Coulters Editorial that USA Today wouldn\'t Print

    [ QUOTE ]
    Wha??? Where'd you hear that?

    [/ QUOTE ]

    There are special Private Banking services available only to the wealthy. These are bank accounts that have no names or addresses attached to them, in order to hide the identity of those who hold them. Citi Bank Corp. and Bank of America is the largest provider of these type of accounts. These type of bank accounts have been found many times to have been used in laundering drug cartel drug money, Muslim charities money that is used to fund terrorists, and have also been used by HUD, and IRS officials that resigned in disgrace when found funneling tax money into them, but often times are a detail that is left out when these kinds of stories are reported in the news.

    Note: (not because the news organizations are trying to hide anything, but because peoples attention spans are so short, it is considered too much detail)

    The American Enterprise Institute has reported to the U.S. Treasury Department that 25% of America's wealth cannot be accounted for in regular business transactions, and much of this money is being held in the Private Banking Industry (i.e. untraceable bank accounts). The American Enterprise Institute estimates that roughly 10% of this laundered money is probably drug cartel money, but could only guess as to where the other 15% of laundered money is coming from.

    When the Patriot ACT was being authored, Senators Carl Levin and the late Paul Wellstone attempted to introduce a resolution that outlawed these private accounts that have no personal information attached to them. This resolution was apposed and shot down in a hurry by wealthy Democrats and Republicans from Kerry and Kennedy to President Bush and VP Cheney. Why would these people be so interested in NOT outlawing these types of accounts?

    If you have enough of an attention span for details then go to this link for more details on who's pocket our tax dollars are going in.

    http://www.whereisthemoney.org/FAQ-detail.htm
     
  9. Shaggy

    Shaggy 3/4 ton status

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2000
    Posts:
    6,737
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Los Banos, CA
  10. 1-ton

    1-ton 1/2 ton status Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Posts:
    2,882
    Likes Received:
    159
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Re: Ann Coulters Editorial that USA Today wouldn\'t Print

    [ QUOTE ]
    How deep does the rabbit hole go?

    [/ QUOTE ]

    I like that second link. A lot of good info in it. Except that it gets a little kooky when they say people like Eisenhower, Nixon, and Bush belong to a secret society that practices human sacrifices.
     
  11. jekbrown

    jekbrown I am CK5 Premium Member GMOTM Winner Author

    Joined:
    May 19, 2001
    Posts:
    45,030
    Likes Received:
    364
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA, USA
    Re: Ann Coulters Editorial that USA Today wouldn\'t Print

    dunno about anyone else, but I don't need to read all that stuff to know that 75% of our tax money is wasted. lol!

    interesting stuff, but the gov has been wasting money forever... thats what it does. It changes the way it does it sometimes, but the waste never goes away.

    j
     
  12. Shaggy

    Shaggy 3/4 ton status

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2000
    Posts:
    6,737
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Los Banos, CA
    Re: Ann Coulters Editorial that USA Today wouldn\'t Print

    [ QUOTE ]
    [ QUOTE ]
    How deep does the rabbit hole go?

    [/ QUOTE ]

    I like that second link. A lot of good info in it.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Try this one on for size... The only page that has this article on it is gone, but I found a Google cache of it. I saved it to a Word doc so I can go back and read it in more detail later...

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:l5eevq5KWzMJ:www.nzaif.com/ucc_cracking_the_code.html+bond+servant+%24630,000&hl=en
     
  13. mtn. burb

    mtn. burb 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    May 13, 2004
    Posts:
    1,260
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Ojai Calif.
    Re: Ann Coulters Editorial that USA Today wouldn\'t Print

    This is kinda off topic but the only people in my family that ever worked in government were in the MILITARY. Then they moved on. Amen. /forums/images/graemlins/usaflag.gif
     
  14. 1-ton

    1-ton 1/2 ton status Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Posts:
    2,882
    Likes Received:
    159
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
  15. Shaggy

    Shaggy 3/4 ton status

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2000
    Posts:
    6,737
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Los Banos, CA

Share This Page