Dismiss Notice

Welcome To CK5!

Registering is free and easy! Hope to see you on the forums soon.

Score a FREE t-shirt and membership sticker when you sign up for a Premium Membership and choose the recurring plan.

For those of you thinking about cadillac engines

Discussion in 'The Garage' started by BranndonC, Jan 9, 2006.

  1. BranndonC

    BranndonC 3/4 ton status

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Posts:
    8,591
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Anaheim, Ca
    The year you get doesnt greatly affect the amount of power that it had in the stock form. Check out these dyno results
    http://www.cad500parts.com/catalog/page7.htm

    The 76 engine (which is what mine is)
    We will start with our low compression buildup, and move on to the high compression engine later on. Our low compression short block was based on a ’76 spec rebuild, and was built with 8:1 instead of 8.5:1 compression due to piston modification for later race combos not detailed here. The short block was bored 0.060" over, with 0.002" piston clearance, reconditioned stock rods with ARP fasteners on an OE crank turned .010/.010 (not balanced), and assembled following stock clearance specs using the following parts:
    Standard off the shelf cast ‘74-’76 replacement pistons (Pg 11)
    True Roller timing set (Pg 12)
    OE HEI distributor
    Moly rings (Pg 10) OE camshaft, new lifters 120cc heads (‘74-’76) #493 Clevite rod and main bearings
    (Pg 10)
    reconditioned OE pushrods Straight 45° valve job (OE valves) Durabond cam bearings (Pg 10) Our light duty street springs
    (Pg 12)
    OE 76 manifolds and carb And the dyno says: 493.5 Lb-Ft at 2600 RPM and 302.1 HP at 3600.

    now the 1970 engine
    The base engine for test mule #2, essentially built to ‘70 Eldorado specs, at 10:1 compression, similar assembly to the 8:1 test mule. The short block features Cad Company's direct replacement forged rods with ARP fasteners, and a balanced rotating assembly due to higher RPM testing to be done later, and was built using:
    cast 10:1 replacement pistons
    (Pg 11)
    True Roller timing set (Pg 12) OE HEI distributor Moly rings (Pg 10) OE camshaft, new lifters 76cc heads (‘68-’73) #250/902 Clevite rod and main bearings
    (Pg 10)
    reconditioned OE pushrods Straight 45° valve job (OE valves) Durabond cam bearings (Pg 10) Our light duty street springs (Pg 12) OE 70 manifolds and OE carb (Pg 22)
    Bone stock it pulled 323 HP and 504 Ft-Lb of torque, about the same as the stock 8:1 with the CTA 120 cam, thoroughly dispelling the myth of the 200+ HP difference between the ‘70 Eldo engine and the later smogger engines.




    This info is just to kill any myths about the different power levels. They were rated differently from 70 to 76, so thats why the manufacturer's power numbers appear so different.
     
  2. trailblazr81

    trailblazr81 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Posts:
    931
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hollister, CA
    Ah yes the good ol' switching from gross to net HP. Tho if I had the money I would just buy a crate 572. Cant beat 620 HP at 9.5:1 compression!! :bow:
     

Share This Page