Dismiss Notice

Welcome To CK5!

Registering is free and easy! Hope to see you on the forums soon.

Score a FREE t-shirt and membership sticker when you sign up for a Premium Membership and choose the recurring plan.

Gas Consumption Theory Question

Discussion in 'The Garage' started by Can Can, Nov 15, 2002.

  1. Can Can

    Can Can Pusher Man Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2000
    Posts:
    15,552
    Likes Received:
    136
    Location:
    Cochrane, Alberta, Canada
    Today while I was roading the backhoe around town I had a thought-

    Does an engine always use the same amount of fuel at a certain RPM? If you rev your motor up to 2000 RPMs at idle, will the motor go through the same amount of fuel as it will cruising down the highway at 2000 RPMs?

    I know that in idle the motor doesn't have to transfer power through the drivetrain, but at speed the truck has momentum which *MAY* help with fuel consumption. So is there an advantage either way? I also know that you have to take load and throttle position into consideration, so I'm just talking about idle vs. cruising speed.

    Anyhow, I hope my question makes sense. I know there are many variables that could affect the actual outcome, but in theory, does anyone know if there's a difference? To me, 2000 RPMs should use the same amount of fuel either way.
     
  2. hammer

    hammer 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2001
    Posts:
    449
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Binghamton N.Y.
    aerodynamics! The faster you go the more fuel you will consume.
     
  3. Can Can

    Can Can Pusher Man Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2000
    Posts:
    15,552
    Likes Received:
    136
    Location:
    Cochrane, Alberta, Canada
    Are you sure? If you have wind resistance it also means you have momentum on your side. Let's assume that you have the exact same amount of pedal into it at 2000 RPMs in both idle AND cruising- shouldn't the engine use similar amounts of fuel?
     
  4. fortcollinsram

    fortcollinsram 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2001
    Posts:
    2,261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Fort Collins, CO
    Yes if you are pushing the pedal the same amount crusing as you are at idle, the engine will use the same amount of fuel, but if you think about it, if you aren't giving it gas, you wouldn't be crusing very fast would you..While engine rpm does affect the amount of fuel used, engine load plays a bigger part..If you are towing 5,000# up a mountain pass you WILL NOT get the same gas mileage as you would crusing on flat with no load, even if the RPMs were kept within a similar window...Have you noticed that crusing downhill on the interstate, you don't have to lay into the pedal much? Then as soon as you go uphill, you gotta give it a bit more? That is b/c the engine is having to move more load and thus requiring more fuel and air to keep that load at a constant speed...

    Chris
     
  5. hammer

    hammer 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2001
    Posts:
    449
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Binghamton N.Y.
    thats what I ment but I didn't fell like typing all that /forums/images/graemlins/thumb.gif
     
  6. Muley

    Muley 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Posts:
    364
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Eagle Mountain, UT
    It think what you are looking for is if at 2000 RPM's will you burn more stationary versus crusing down the road.

    My opinion is that you would burn LESS fuel on the road. Here is my reasoning.

    Get out on the open, flat interstate and get up to speed. Get the RPM's up to lets say the 2000 mark. Set the cruise control. Now watch/ feel the gas pedal. It will move. It will depress when it needs a little more fuel then back off when it doesn't. So based on that, I think it would burn less.

    Now here is the possible catch, would it really be enough difference that you would be able to tell? Probably not.

    Just my simple opinion.
     
  7. Can Can

    Can Can Pusher Man Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2000
    Posts:
    15,552
    Likes Received:
    136
    Location:
    Cochrane, Alberta, Canada
    Did I not say this? :

    </font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
    I also know that you have to take load and throttle position into consideration, so I'm just talking about idle vs. cruising speed.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Ummmmmmm.....did you read my whole post? It doesn't sound like it, brother. /forums/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif
     
  8. Can Can

    Can Can Pusher Man Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2000
    Posts:
    15,552
    Likes Received:
    136
    Location:
    Cochrane, Alberta, Canada
    Yeah, that's along the same lines as I was thinking. Your Cruise Control example was a smart way to illustrate the concept. Good job, brother!!!! /forums/images/graemlins/thumb.gif /forums/images/graemlins/thumb.gif
     
  9. hammer

    hammer 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2001
    Posts:
    449
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Binghamton N.Y.
    sationary you don't have to turn the drivetrain on the highway you do and areodynamics plays a big deal on your fuel economy. the faster you drive the more gas you use even when you go the same distance, there is more strain on the engine cuz there is more pressure on the veicle from the wind.
     
  10. MEPR

    MEPR 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Posts:
    1,546
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    McChord AFB
    you will always burn more fuel running. Think about it your moving a 5-6000lbs baheamoth of a truck that has a drag coeficiant of 100% (probly not that much but close!). Now if you we in my truck (all whoping 2600lbs of it) there might be a debate /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
     
  11. TWISTEDJACK

    TWISTEDJACK 1/2 ton status GMOTM Winner

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Posts:
    882
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Boise, ID
    Try this take your rig up to 2000 rpm cruising down the road, shift into neutral without removing your foot from the pedal, your engine is now doing 4000-5000rpm!!! Now that should tell you that it would consume more fuel moving than sitting still.
     
  12. 4x4Freak

    4x4Freak 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2002
    Posts:
    792
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lubbock, TX
    When under load it takes more fuel to get/keep the rpms up. But with no load it takes much less.
     
  13. Can Can

    Can Can Pusher Man Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2000
    Posts:
    15,552
    Likes Received:
    136
    Location:
    Cochrane, Alberta, Canada
    I tried doing that in OD at 55MPH and the RPMs were only slightly higher.

    You do have point, though.....
     
  14. TXsizeK5

    TXsizeK5 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2001
    Posts:
    2,518
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    College Station, TX
    Well, with manual its easier... in 2nd gear i can be at 2.5k and ill put in the clutch and keep my right foot wher eit is and it jumps to maybe 4 or 5k. OD wont be as much beucase you are alreayd at low RPMS not giving it much gas while going down the highway... manual works best for this test.
     
  15. Blazer1970

    Blazer1970 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2000
    Posts:
    1,600
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Old Mission, MI
    Any engine will use A LOT more fuel at a given RPM under load than it will with no load. The more torque the engine is putting out, the more fuel it will use. Have you ever looked at how the governor works on your lawn mower? This is a good mechanism to illustrate the concept. It is designed to work at a constant RPM, but will automatically open the throttle wider as the load increases. Once the throttle is wide open, if the load increases more, the RPMs will drop.
     
  16. HarryH3

    HarryH3 1 ton status Author

    Joined:
    May 31, 2000
    Posts:
    10,384
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Georgetown, TX
    You need to think of fuel consuption in terms of the amount of work being performed. More work requires more engery. In this case, the energy comes from consuming fuel. Ever notice that your rig burns more fuel when towing a heavy trailer than it does when running unladen? That's because the engine has to work harder to maintain RPM at a given speed when dragging the extra load behind the truck.
     
  17. Grim-Reaper

    Grim-Reaper 3/4 ton status Author

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2000
    Posts:
    7,385
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    I see what your asking and there is some things going on in the auto industry about this.
    Engines do have a range where they are more fuel efficient. Problem is gearing. Honda in particular is playing with a variable gear ratio transmission that uses a funky belt (steel) so they can vary the diameter of the the pullys and maintain the same RPM on the engine but it will still accelerate due to a variable ratio transmission. The problem is making a strong enough transmission to do this. They are playing with High fuel efficent light cars with small engines and they are still having an issue with reliability.
    The sweet spot on a 350 is around 2200RPM. Thats pretty well in line with their peak torque vs fuel consumption. If this ever comes to the market place what will happen when you press the accelerator to go faster is the engine will come up into it's peak torqure range and stay there and then the transmission will change it's ratio to most accomidate the peddle input. Then once you acchieve the speed you want and back off the peddl the engine will drop Rpm to a more fuel effiecent range that it is capable of of maintaining the speed. When you com to a hill the engine RPM and transmission ratio will change to maintain the speed even though you haven't changed the possition of the peddle.
    They will take some getting use to that's for sure if you think about hearing the engine RPM's changing even though you haven't changed input.
     
  18. m j

    m j 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2001
    Posts:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    0
    Subaru actually sold tons of those trannys.
    did Honda's ever make it to market?
     
  19. Grim-Reaper

    Grim-Reaper 3/4 ton status Author

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2000
    Posts:
    7,385
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Ohhh yeah the Justy had one didn't it. I rode in one of those. Weird little car. Floor it and the engie would come up in RPMS and hold the same note but car still accelerated.
     
  20. BlueBlazer

    BlueBlazer 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2001
    Posts:
    1,940
    Likes Received:
    0
    Are we talking about your truck with the 6.2?
     

Share This Page