I was reading 4 wheeler from a couple years ago and they had an article on CG. They were saying that a lifted truck will give you more of an adrenaline rush because of the front end feeling light. It got me wondering which is better for hill climbin... lifted or non lifted. there are obvious benefits to both: for non lifted its the obvious fact that the cg is lower and you'll have better traction to all 4 tires. for lifted its the fact that you can take lines that non lifted rigs can't because they'll bottom out or get stuck but you will have less traction to the front wheels and better traction to the rear. All this is heresay once you get out and do some hills with a low and high rig. also with a lifted rig you have bigger tires which means bigger contact patch. I mostly want to know because my bro has a stock 91 4dr jimmy with a 4.3 and 31x10.50 baja claw radials and i have an 88 K5 with a 6" inch lift and 35x12.50 big foot m/t radials with a hot 355 in it. How many of you have been out on some hills and been outdone by a stock rig or visa versa by a lifted rig... basically i want to know who is king of the hill(pun intended) in my family.