Okay folks, here they are, the nominees for the December Wanker of the Month with a brief synopsis of why they were nominated. At the end of each nomination will be the number of nominations, along with the electoral votes that will be factored into the final tally. So sit back and relax and cast your vote. 87sm465np208-The evidence included in the nominations of this member is not only vast, but I do believe constitutes great wankerism above and beyond the call of duty. Let's review: 1. Double posting pics of his truck 2. Talking about women in the fawkin Tech forums, evidence can be seen here Exibit 3. And last but not least, and I do believe this is got to be high on the all time lists of being a wanker. This nominee offered to send one of our beloved and highly honored members <font color="purple">pics of his Johnson</font color>, and I'm not talking outboard motors here folks...... <font color="red">(nominations:2 electoral votes:22)</font color> Z3PR-where does one start when talking about this guy? It must be something in the water up there in South Dakota, but let me recap some of the reasons why mass nominations flowed in like the the Colorado on a rainy day. 1. Asking the difference between a C series and K series GM truck with a post count total over 4000, and he hasn't been here all that long folks. /forums/images/graemlins/1zhelp.gif 2. Double posting. 3. And from the Order of the Wanker itself, for submitting the mother of all clusterfawk nominations which will entitle this poor, lost soul to a double, secret nomination total. <font color="red">(nominations:14 electoral votes:3)</font color> Personal note: Hey Paul, with all the dead Indians getting to vote last election cycle, you should really lobby for your state to get 4 electoral votes. landsmasher-Why was this poor webmaster for the SCBD club nominated? 1. For not knowing what a wanker is. California Education System if you ask me. /forums/images/graemlins/rotfl.gif 2. And another nomination from the Order of the Wanker, for questioning the rules and regulations regarding the voting process. Now, you would think that if I don't know what the heck I am doing, that I would be able to 'splain anything to anybody. <font color="red">(nominations:2 electoral votes:54)</font color> mountainexplorer- Our next nominee of the month. Now the religous followers need no explanation here folks, but let us recap some of the hilites for the less informed. 1. The Girl at the Shuck's Counter. 'Nuff said. <font color="red">(nominations:1 electoral votes:11)</font color> Wait a friggin second, Washington gets that many. I thought y'all were too busy sipping java at Starbucks, protesting the WTO and smoking dope to even care about voting? /forums/images/graemlins/rotfl.gif BranndonC-Here's another repeat contestant from last month.....There's not much to be said here folks except for 1. His chop ethic is somewhat flawed. <font color="red">(nominations: 2 electoral votes:54)</font color> coloradoK5-Oh no, yes, the Grand Master himself received a nomination this month. Now, I personally do not know just what the person who nominated him was thinking, maybe he wants to be banished to a ricer site. 1. for the following problem remaining unfixed: when you type something up, and hit CONTINUE, and expect to get a post done, and for whatever goofy reason you get the message of "not all fields are filled in, please hit the BACK on your browser to correct this"and when you do so, everything you typed is LOST <font color="red">(nominations:1 electoral votes:8)</font color> Sad day when Washington gets more electoral votes than Colorado. uglychevy383-While I feel that this nomination is unjust, I must remain impartial at all times, so it stands. 1. If you have never seen his sidepic, he likes to remind everyone that they are number 1 in his book. <font color="red">(nominations:1 electoral votes:11)</font color> BRBoudreaux-Of course ole Bubba Ray gets nominated, let's recap why. 1. I am the WHOLE F'N WANKER!!!! <font color="red">(nominations:3 electoral votes:8)</font color> Chaz-Poor Chaz, gets nominated just for this, 1. Traded a First Gen K5 for a Heep. <font color="red">(nominations:1 electoral votes:54)</font color> Stickseler-is the next name on the ballot. Now you may ask yourself why, it's simple.... 1. Stayed up whining about the overworked Order of the Wanker. <font color="red">(nominations:1 electoral votes:13)</font color> shewheeler-needs no introduction here folks, another homie down with the Order, she took last month's crown. 1. She believes she was railroaded like a caboose in last month's election. <font color="red">(nominations:1 electoral votes:54)</font color> newyorkin-Poor Ratch has been dragged into this nonsense, why do you ask? 1. his excessively not-cute pun in the thread about refrigerator lights... or dryers... or something like that... <font color="red">(nominations:1 electoral votes:33)</font color> or2play-I don't even know this nominee... 1. being the first burban to run springer setup... <font color="red">(nominations:1 electoral votes:8)</font color> Capman2k-I believe this is a repeat customer. 1. A Ford person on this site, 'nuff said. <font color="red">(nominations:1 electoral votes:3)</font color> NoSmog73-another NCBD member getting dragged into the fray, let's recap his misdeeds. 1. Misspelling, though I do believe that's a education issue. 2. Misconception he was behind the winner of last month's contest. <font color="red">(nominations:3 electoral votes:54)</font color> gokartergo-while I type this, I do believe that the beloved daddy of the NCBD bangers is nominated unjustly, since while I type this, he is currently on the road trip of death gathering contributions for the club's food drive. 1. "I'm loving it.. You 2 are so busy fighting you forgot about me" <font color="red">(nominations:1 electoral votes:54)</font color> So there you have it folks, the list is long and distiguished. I remind you to take your time and think out your choice throughly before casting your ballot, cause we don't need Al Gore bringing his NYU lawyers into this place demanding a recount.