Dismiss Notice

Welcome To CK5!

Registering is free and easy! Hope to see you on the forums soon.

Score a FREE t-shirt and membership sticker when you sign up for a Premium Membership and choose the recurring plan.

Thanks to the treehuggers

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by Bubba Ray Boudreaux, Sep 20, 2002.

  1. Bubba Ray Boudreaux

    Bubba Ray Boudreaux 1 ton status

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2001
    Posts:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Undisclosed Location
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot 1/2 ton status Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2000
    Posts:
    3,112
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Western Massachusetts
    All I can say it "TRUTH"

    I have to laugh at the extremists. They say they are saving the earth, I just wish they could realize they are helping to severely change it (which they are opposed to). Change is part of nature, preservation can only go so far. I know several environmentalists that help to keep man from hastily changing the earth, but also realize it happens naturally (floods, tornados, drought, winds, etc), and try to keep it to a minimum while also enjoying the beauty of nature (they belong to "tread lightly"). I agree with conserving natural resources and landscapes, not preserving them (like some sort of jelly).

    Just my 2 cents! Flame away.
     
  3. Bubba Ray Boudreaux

    Bubba Ray Boudreaux 1 ton status

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2001
    Posts:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Undisclosed Location
    </font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
    I agree with conserving natural resources and landscapes, not preserving them (like some sort of jelly).

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Same here.
     
  4. Sandman

    Sandman 3/4 ton status Author

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Posts:
    5,653
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Pocatello, ID
    I printed it out and hung it above my desk at work. /forums/images/icons/grin.gif
     
  5. mercercadet

    mercercadet 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2002
    Posts:
    216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Georgia
    Keep up the good work bubba...I'll give that to one of my professors in the political science dept. He's a greenie and ought to like it pretty well /forums/images/icons/wink.gif
     
  6. NoAngel

    NoAngel 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2001
    Posts:
    1,497
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Northampton,MA
    I love the ones that are vegetarians, but will spend $200 on a pair of leather shoes. /forums/images/icons/tongue.gif
    They don't eat animals, but they make fine footwear!
     
  7. shane74

    shane74 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2002
    Posts:
    4,100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    "Vegetarian" - Old Indian word for lousy hunter. /forums/images/icons/grin.gif
     
  8. BranndonC

    BranndonC 3/4 ton status

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Posts:
    8,591
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Anaheim, Ca
    i don't want to sound like a total idiot here, but i don't get it? did an enviromentalist start that fire ?
     
  9. Sandman

    Sandman 3/4 ton status Author

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Posts:
    5,653
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Pocatello, ID
    They are against managing the forest. Treefall builds up and provides fuel for fires. Selective logging can help this. It can be a pretty hot debate.
     
  10. BranndonC

    BranndonC 3/4 ton status

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Posts:
    8,591
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Anaheim, Ca
    well i think people should clear out fallen trees, what is the reason for leaving them ?
     
  11. Sandman

    Sandman 3/4 ton status Author

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Posts:
    5,653
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Pocatello, ID
    Actually going there with vehicles and cutting logging roads is one of the issues. Its one of those debates where nobody wins untill something happens, like a forest fire, that proves a point. I think its been proven.
     
  12. shane74

    shane74 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2002
    Posts:
    4,100
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver, WA
    Lots of uneducated folks will say something about disturbing natural habitat and ecosystems. There is much truth to that, but as man closes in on animals and their living space, then we need to help manage that space otherwise when it goes up in flames, where do the critters have to live?? Think of this, when a fire destroys a forest, where do the animals end up? Many of them end up in areas they aren't supposed to be, or they are in such a cramped forest that many die from the lack of basic needs. Think of it like this. If the US burned down except for say like Arizona, and all the people had to go there to live, it'd be a VERY bad thing. You would have food shortages, water shortages, cramped conditions, and prolly a lot of crime for survival. The same goes for the animals in the forest. If you push them in too close, you do just as much harm. So what is worse, preventing huge fires by cleaning up the forest and risk damaging a natural ecosystem, or do you let mother nature wait until the trash is too much and she burnes it ALL down?? I have my own opinion, but it's something to think about.
     

Share This Page