Dismiss Notice

Welcome To CK5!

Registering is free and easy! Hope to see you on the forums soon.

Score a FREE t-shirt and membership sticker when you sign up for a Premium Membership and choose the recurring plan.

years with a deisel?

Discussion in '1982-Present GM Diesel' started by four_by_ken, Nov 3, 2004.

  1. four_by_ken

    four_by_ken 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2001
    Posts:
    3,806
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Allenton, MI
    What years Blazer had deisels?

    6.2?
    6.5?

    Thanks

    Thinking of one for a daily driver instead of the S-10. I get 24 mpg in the 4 cyl S-10... if I can get anywhwere near that in a full size... I just may do it.
     
  2. AgDieseler

    AgDieseler Certified Scrap Producer Premium Member GMOTM Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2001
    Posts:
    1,036
    Likes Received:
    1,095
    Location:
    Dallas
    Blazer 82-91, 6.2L NA C
    Blazer/2 Dr Tahoe 92-97ish(?), 6.5TD L56

    Both engines would be the light duty version with emissions controls, and look for and average mpg somewhere near 18-20 and 15-18 respectively.

    6.2Ls were fueled differently from 6.5TDs with a typical flow rate of 50-59 cu mm for the former and 60-65 for the latter.

    Both would be a very cool ride, especially a later body style diesel, since they are mighty scarce. /forums/images/graemlins/thumb.gif
     
  3. 6.2puller

    6.2puller 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    Posts:
    569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New England
    I thought they started in 82?? I could be wrong though and probably am.
     
  4. Drey

    Drey 3/4 ton status

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Posts:
    8,288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Iowa
    Ya I coulda sworn 6.2s started in 82
     
  5. tRustyK5

    tRustyK5 Big meanie Staff Member Super Moderator GMOTM Winner Author

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2000
    Posts:
    36,170
    Likes Received:
    1,379
    Location:
    E-town baby!
    First 6.2 Blazer or Jimmy was 82. Before that the deisel option was the Olds 350 deisel abortion.

    Rene
     
  6. AgDieseler

    AgDieseler Certified Scrap Producer Premium Member GMOTM Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2001
    Posts:
    1,036
    Likes Received:
    1,095
    Location:
    Dallas
    Whoops! Previous post edited for accuracy. /forums/images/graemlins/whistling.gif

    Something that I just thought about is that there are guys with 6.2Ls in their LWB trucks getting 25+ mpg. And there's not much to it either. Most started with a 2wd, numerically low gears for low cruising rpms, low fuel rates, and gave it plenty of room to breath.

    I recall someone on the DP topping out at 32 mpg with a 6.2L with 200k on the clock. /forums/images/graemlins/eek.gif

    I bet with enough tuning, a 4wd blazer could turn out economy numbers over 20 mpg easily given a good running engine. Fuel, air, and timing - that's about it.
     
  7. imiceman44

    imiceman44 1 ton status

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2002
    Posts:
    15,160
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA
    [ QUOTE ]
    Blazer 82-91, 6.2L NA C
    Blazer/2 Dr Tahoe 92-97ish(?), 6.5TD L56

    Both engines would be the light duty version with emissions controls, and look for and average mpg somewhere near 18-20 and 15-18 respectively.

    6.2Ls were fueled differently from 6.5TDs with a typical flow rate of 50-59 cu mm for the former and 60-65 for the latter.

    Both would be a very cool ride, especially a later body style diesel, since they are mighty scarce. /forums/images/graemlins/thumb.gif

    [/ QUOTE ]

    One thing though, the 92 blazer was a NA 6.5 only, there was no 93 and then 94 had the 6.5TD and then 95 became the tahoe.
     
  8. tRustyK5

    tRustyK5 Big meanie Staff Member Super Moderator GMOTM Winner Author

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2000
    Posts:
    36,170
    Likes Received:
    1,379
    Location:
    E-town baby!
    i think Joez pulled down 25 mpg with his Blazer somewhat recently...Canmore gets mid 20's with his pick-up.

    20-22 should be pretty easy even in a K5.

    Rene
     
  9. joez

    joez 1/2 ton status

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Posts:
    2,512
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New Lenox, Illinois
    Yup, 25.7 mpg. Now im averaging right under/arround 20 with 36" TSL's.

    Heres the setup that broke 25mpg:
    85 K5, 220K on the clock, rebuilt pump and injectors, dual 2 1/2" exhaust, Stanadyne performance formula, 3.73 gears, 33" radial BFG's, 700R4, and drove it easy. I have since added the J-code intake, modified the intake snorkel, but switched my wheel and tire combo, and i now drive with a heavier right foot.
     
  10. OFFRDK5

    OFFRDK5 1/2 ton status Premium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2000
    Posts:
    1,881
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Central IL
    FYI. It's Diesel instead of Deisel!!

    And you can get great mileage out of a 6.2. I got 27 mpg. 10 bolts, 3.08 ratio, 31x10.50s, 700R4, empty, and a light right foot. The skinny pedal will determine your mileage. The more you push it and when you "fly" down the highway your mileage will drop like a lead weight!!
     
  11. imiceman44

    imiceman44 1 ton status

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2002
    Posts:
    15,160
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA
    [ QUOTE ]
    FYI. It's Diesel instead of Deisel!!

    And you can get great mileage out of a 6.2. I got 27 mpg. 10 bolts, 3.08 ratio, 31x10.50s, 700R4, empty, and a light right foot. The skinny pedal will determine your mileage. The more you push it and when you "fly" down the highway your mileage will drop like a lead weight!!

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Yep mileage is the opposite of a gasser on the highway I average 20MPG on mine, but 30MPG in town since it's mostly just off idle so I run on fumes most of the times, but on the highway I red line it most of the times so it's a big difference.
     

Share This Page