Discussion in '1973-1991 K5 Blazer | Truck | Suburban' started by tim_87, Feb 5, 2001.
wondering would I benefit more from a chip or tpi spacer or both. my ride has 33's and a auto trans
First of all, welcome to the best and most addictive site on the web!
Second, you don't have TPI (Tuned Port Injection) on your '87, unless you converted it from TBI (Throttle Body Injection). From the question about the spacer, think you have TBI (looks like a carb on your manifold).
Third, there are varied opinions from the guys on this site about the use of the chip on a stock motor. Some guys will tell ya to not waste your money..........the spacer might help a bit, might be more valuable to do things like dual exhaust, K&N air filter, etc. first, then try the chip. We had to use a custom chip for my TPI 406 (see site below) but this is on a far from stock motor.............
Again, welcome aboard.
<font color=orange>'79 - 406 TPI -<font color=orange> K5#5 - <font color=blue>See it at---><A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.blazzinor.coloradok5.com>http://www.blazzinor.coloradok5.com</A>
Unless your engine is out of a Vette or a Camaro, then you have TBI...
My firend used the spacer on his 93 Ext. Cab 4x4 Z-71, but he didn't notice much of a difference.
I put a chip in an 88 Camaro I had once. It was a 2.8 v6 and I noticed a difference with the new chip. The chip I used was a Jet Stage 2 chip. But in order to use stage 2 chips, youneed to have an exhaust and a cooler thermostat...
See <font color=green>EMMETT</font color=green> -> <A target="_blank" HREF=http://emmett.coloradok5.com>http://emmett.coloradok5.com</A>
All I've ever heard from folks with a stock motor is that the chip was the biggest waste of money they spent, bar none. Headers will net you more power by far, probably for a bit more cost, but definitely worth it.
My K5 and Chev/Olds tech/links page: <A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.dorianyeager.com/index2.html>http://www.dorianyeager.com/index2.html</A>
Separate names with a comma.