Well there's alot going on. Since you don't have the heads you can't CC them. Punch in some 58cc heads in there and see what you get...I’d rather fix it now than later, if I gotta swap pistons tell me now, I don’t want to do that twice, I’m considering swapping cams but that’s the extent
I agree with Beags. If you don't have heads yet, spec the heads out to get the desired CR out of the pistons you have. If 64 or 58cc chamber volumes don't get what you want, then it may be time to swap pistons. Run the numbers on the 58cc chambers and report back.I’d rather fix it now than later, if I gotta swap pistons tell me now, I don’t want to do that twice, I’m considering swapping cams but that’s the extent
Typically the cylinder design is limited in 58s and not the best for high performance use. I think you probably should check your deck height to see how far down in the hole the Pistons are in at tdc.No. From what I see options are stupid limited.![]()
More chance to blow them out.If I go with these head gaskets the calculator says 9.47:1 with the 64cc heads I want.
What’s the pros and cons of doing it this way?
View attachment 289581
They have some issues with valve lift and geometry, and require a different rocker. Research it before you jumpHow crazy would I be to throw a set of Vortec heads on here and go? Compression would be 9.01:1 as listed in this message, obviously horse power would be down but how bad? It's going to save me about $400 on heads, and I'm guessing at 9.01:1 I could run cheap gas? Obviously the trade off will be less power but how much less are we talking here is there a good way to give it an estimated guess? The whole reason aluminum heads came up in the first place is because I was worried about 'pinging' and heard you could run higher compression with them. If I were to go the Vortec head route it would save me from more pistons, cam swap, etc.