Interpreting the post seems to be lost "Cost Effective" is the driving criteria.... project is already over budget. 50k is bad enough, could burn 100k+ with extra modifications...
If you enjoy a ride rougher than old horse and wagon god bless you....
The older you get, the less you enjoy taking a beating hour after pounding down the pavement.
My last company SUV was a Ford Eddie Bauer Bronco... It rode as smooth as a car. There was no comparison between the Blazer too the Bronco for ride quality. When GM canceled the leaf spring chassis, it was years behind the competition.
If you don't like a hi standard for a baseline, so be it.
Once you drive in or ride in a modern chassis, it's hard to be satisfied with a primitive crude chassis.
Could I modify a suspension? Yes, but could I get a factory quality hi end ride without bad behavior, doubtful.
Fun.... I find nothing enjoyable or fun dumping large sums of cash into a bottomless pit that has no real cash value. If it doesn't give a good utility value, it's a financial blunder.
From the comments I've seen, as of yet, no one has personally attempted, nor heavily modified a chassis for asphalt driving.
It's a sad day when a 1990 vehicle drives choppier than a 1935 Convertible going down the highway.
Possibly, throwing the underside away+ substituting a newer A-Frame Blazer/ Tahoe undercarriage would be more cost effective
If you enjoy a ride rougher than old horse and wagon god bless you....
The older you get, the less you enjoy taking a beating hour after pounding down the pavement.
My last company SUV was a Ford Eddie Bauer Bronco... It rode as smooth as a car. There was no comparison between the Blazer too the Bronco for ride quality. When GM canceled the leaf spring chassis, it was years behind the competition.
If you don't like a hi standard for a baseline, so be it.
Once you drive in or ride in a modern chassis, it's hard to be satisfied with a primitive crude chassis.
Could I modify a suspension? Yes, but could I get a factory quality hi end ride without bad behavior, doubtful.
Fun.... I find nothing enjoyable or fun dumping large sums of cash into a bottomless pit that has no real cash value. If it doesn't give a good utility value, it's a financial blunder.
From the comments I've seen, as of yet, no one has personally attempted, nor heavily modified a chassis for asphalt driving.
It's a sad day when a 1990 vehicle drives choppier than a 1935 Convertible going down the highway.
Possibly, throwing the underside away+ substituting a newer A-Frame Blazer/ Tahoe undercarriage would be more cost effective
You've mentioned a range rover a couple of times... A leaf sprung old chevy is not that. You can improve the ride substantially with newer technology but there will be compromises IE: lift, expense, other modifications to make it all work together. You can do just about anything but if you don't have the ability you are going to have pay someone who does and that didn't come to that guy overnight so you are paying for knowledge, craftsmanship, experience ect.
Making these things work is part of the fun. It's not for everyone. If you want a rangerover then do that. Its comparing apples to footballs, It's not my thing but to each their own.
Last edited:
