The Rev. Jesse Jackson has taken on another cause but this time i think he has a point. Some of the things he get's behind are ludicrous in my opinion, but this particular incident made me think he could have cause to raise his normal overt uproar. A few weeks back in a neighbooring county there were some UC's involved in a drug bust being backed by uniform patrol officer's of course. With what i have been able to find out from some men in law enforcement that would know (not from the media because i put little faith in the validity of many stories in the media today.), the subject was not suspected to be armed and when the take down occured he panicked and tried to run putting some of the officers in the path of the vehicle. now at this point i say take him out protect the officer, and they did so. the thing the reverand has a problem with or at least is claiming as his motivation for involement is the fact that the suspect recieved multiple GSW's 4 to the face 2 to the upper chest and 1 to the back of the head. I agree that the use of deadly force was neccisary, and think that SLED wil find that it was proper to use deadly force in ythis situation. But did they go to far? was the Amount of force use neccisary?