Biggest positive on the Klune is more gearing options (instead of 2 cases at essentially 2:1), lighter by a bit, and shorter by a few inches.
My understanding (never having done the numbers myself) is that if you have the 203 and a 31 or 32 spline input 205, and enough wheel base (generally 100” or over), and don't mind the extra weight (about 30 lbs?) then the doubler will be quite a bit cheaper. But, if you have to find/buy the 203 (can often be had for free) and deal with the 205 input (large bearing 31 or 32 spline female) then that cuts into the savings and may make the shorter/lighter/deeper geared Klune more competitive. As I recall, that was what caused Nash to go with the Klune even though it is more expensive.
Here is one more thing to think about though that will make the Doubler more competitive if you don't already have the correct 205. The common as dirt Ford 205 input is 31 spline and can be used in the GM case with no more effort than the expensive and hard to find (ORD has them new) 32 spline GM. Both use the same large bearing and are equaling robust. I got a good price on a Ford 205 and put the 31 spline Ford input in my GM case with the side bene of a front 32 spline output so I could run the 1410 front yoke. Even if you don’t want front 1410, this also gets you a stronger output to replace the only known weak point in the GM 205.
Hope that makes some sense...