bigcountryk5 said:
but seriously it is dangerous to attach your cage to the frame it will weakin both the cage and the frame.
I just love how things get blown out of perportion
A couple of years ago a fiew chevy guys (who happen to belong to this website) started saying that you should attatch your cage to the body because it will crack your frame. It is my opinion and the opinion of almost every racing division and experienced cage builder that you should attatch the cage to the frame.
Almost every argument I have herd for attatching to the body is bogus.
I have yet to see a frame crack because a cage was attatched to it to stiffen it. I have however seen an awfull lot of frames bend an brake without a cage. Infact most racers tie their cage to the frame to streingthen it. If this were true people would be throwing out the extra cross member next to their steering box to allow it to flex and not crack instead of stiffening the area.
We arn't doing 220 around a race track. The last thing I need is more objects breaking off when I roll and trying to hit me. I like being able to roll it back on its wheels and keep on going instead of karting it off the mountain in severial pieces.
PhoenixZorn: shackles arn't "immensely strong" infact a piece of flat bar is probubly one of the worst structural designs when in bending or compression.
Tieing to the frame isn't hard or expensive. Infact you can probubly do it with most of the leftover material (drops) from the cage you just built. If you are realy motivated you can use some bushing to help soften the vibrations...but I think they are highly overrated because most rigs with their mud tires, growly v8's, loose bodys or open tops have so much noise anyway that it doesn't realy mater. Plus I would rather have my cage connections be a true canalever connection instead of a 1 DOF joint...
Now don't get me wrong...any cage is better than no cage. But to say a body mounted cage is "better" than a frame mounted cage is total BS...