Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by cbbr, Jan 8, 2007.
If you need proof, with pictures, just read here
"I'm Fairly certain you're breaking some kind of stupidity limit."
Holy crap! At least it looks like pretty much a one man show with all the other posters ridiculing him.
They appear to be the same size too!
Might be fun to poke some questions.
1. Since the world is 2 dimensional why are the people 3 dimensional?
2. How do you account for orbiting satellite & astronaut photos clearly showing a globe?
3. Explain the operation of a gyroscope in a 2 dimensional space.
4. Explain the sunrise and sunset with a fixed point over a flat disk.
5. Explain tidal surge
6. How many lobotomies have you had?
et, et and so forth.
that good enough for ya smarty pants?
Okay then, explain why T&A is rounded and not disc shaped.
i still think we have never landed on the moon.
oh god not again
come on Dave.its a fun arguement. here are my points. 1 why did it take all that power to get to the moon,but that little ship made it all the way back? 2 if whats his face was the first man on the moon,who set up the camera to video him "stepping off"? 3 why has NO one ever gone back? 4 how did they know back in the 60's how much the buggy/ boots had to weigh for the amount of gravity? 5 how did they KNOW there was limmited gravity? 6 whats the point anyway?we can't figure out how to live easy on earth.why think we can colonize another planet? 7 we barely make it to the spacestation. 8 the astronaut had no shadow. 9 we have never been to the moon
1: it took all that power to excape earth gravity, th emoon was used to sling shot it back, there is no drag in space, set an object in motion and it will continue unless acted upone by and outside force.
2: the cam was mounted on the let of the landing craft, and activated from inside
3:what the hell for?, although i had read they were thinking of going back..
4/5: they knew the size of the moon knowing it was smaller and gravity is relative to size of the planitoids mass, they could make a educated guess as to how much it would take to weigh down they boots ect.
6:I agree, beating out the russians was the point befor now
7:totaly diferent, the shutle is much bigger payload with less fuel, a pic of the two the same scale shows how huge the rockit was compared to how little the payload.
8: the astronaut does have a shadow, in the pic your refuring two, the astronaut was jumping and the pic was taken when he was in the air, casing the shadow to fall further back then would be if he was on the ground.
9: No matter how well they made the film of them "landing' on the moon (if it was made) NO absolutly NOT, could any 1960's doctored films, could stand up to the [SIZE=-1] velociraptor editing software out today.
the bigest proof, comes from the fact that noone ever hurd about this till the internet.
i should find the video of Glen whats his name other guy on the moon with neil armstrong, smacking a guy so said he dident go to the moon LOL>
Dood, you will be right at home wit the flatearth guys.
While you guys are at it could you find out who shot Kennedy.
Dave,if i don't beleive them. why would i beleive a friend??i need a minute. i just got off the phone with the wife.
That was some kid over the grassy knoll, in the park, that flicked his marble too hard.
I don't need proof that there was a moon landing... because I know there was... but if I was looking, the comment above would be the best there is. It didn't matter if you had all the resources of the US government (let alone a small group of conspirators!)... it was 1969... and current photo analysis techniques would tear bogus fakes a new arsehole.
but then whoever did the analysis would get kilt by the conspiritors. so they couldn't blow the lid off the whole thing.
Well, I'm an "RE'er"
The ice wall thing around the edge is histerical.
Oh, I forgot, the airline pilots are part of the conspiricy, along with the GPS manufacturers. Opps...my bad..
I'll switch to an FE'er now!
Separate names with a comma.