dyeager535 said:
First off, I'm not going to dignify your ridiculous attempts to insult me or anyone on this board with a response. Everyone that reads your posts will begin to realize what kind of person you are, thats enough for me. I find it funny that you as the one that is "right" by your own recognition, is the one that stoops to name calling and insults. As to your misinformation, keep posting it, I'll do my best to prove you wrong every time.
I dont see myself insulting anyone "else" on here. Please quote me where i do.
So because i have been trained in GM EFI systems and general EFI systems, my knowledge is "misinformed"? But good luck in trying to prove me wrong when all you are is a backyard mechanic with a highschool diploma.
dyeager535 said:
So lets see. Reading how things work (whether on internet or books) isn't how you learn? You learn everything by trial and error, like tolerances when building an engine, or putting together a transmission? You know by tearing down an O2 sensor how it works?
That is how normal people learn, but not in your case. The way to learn is to tear an engine apart 50 times and putting it back together? Same with a transmission? You must learn the stupid way. Your going to drop a transmission and rebuild it because learning is fun? No, i dont know how an 02 sensor works by tearing it apart. No one would ever realize how an o2 sensor works besides an engineer and someone who has a chemistry degree.
dyeager535 said:
Are you actually asking a question, or do you know the answer. FYI (and you are going to hear this a bunch in this post I suspect) we aren't dealing with OBD2 or airbags. What system is the poster using? Thats right, we had this discussion about comprehension before didn't we?
Yes, I am asking a question. Will your laptop diagnose OBDII systems and other OBDI systems? And, Yes, we are dealing with OBD2. What i have been discussing is the cost of EFI tools compared to Carb tools. What happened to your reading comprehension. One of the systems of EFI is OBDII. But that must be a new idea to you. It is on the internet, go learn away.
Lets look at my quote where i start to compare the two.
fierospeeder said:
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 110
to diagnose a carb, you only need 200 dollars worth of tools and with fuel injection you start getting into thousands.
dyeager535 said:
So a repair shop cares what mV 13.5:1 is on a narrowband O2 sensor, or do they care about whether or not a $50 part switches from rich to lean to follow the fueling pattern of the engine? Or, as in most cases, will it just get replaced? Replacing good parts is wasteful, I agree, guaranteed 95% of all shops will just replace it, and not bother testing it. Don't know about you, but at $70+ an hour, I think I'd rather pay someone to replace it in 5 minutes than sit around and diagnose a $50 piece for a couple of hours.
A trained and qualified technician cares what mV the o2 sensor is producing on a labscope. That what professionals call "diagnosis"
So you rather pay 1000 dollars worth of parts instead of paying 2 hours worth of diagnostic time and a 120 dollar map sensor(ex)? Must have been a lot of inbreeding in your family.
And why would it take couple of hours to test an oxygen sensor? With a labscope, i can do it within 5 minutes. So how do you get couple of hours now? Do you even know how to test an oxygen sensor. Wait, ill let you go on the internet and look it up. So you can look smarter next time replying after doing some research because your not a trained mechanic.
dyeager535 said:
So tell us, how does GM TBI trigger a check engine light for Evap? How does the TBI system know there is a failure in the Evap system? Since you don't learn by reading, I'm assuming your answer will be off the top of your head.
look the answer up. I wont let you leach off my own education that i paid for and got through experience.
But i will give you a hint, theres a sensor.
dyeager535 said:
"Close enough" huh? Glad you can live with that, sounds like you do on a daily basis. The emissions testing facilities are just wasting time and money with all those emissions testing machines they have, they should just be using a vacuum port on the carb?
i fix cars on a daily basis? That would mean i have more experience then someone that reads stuff on the internet and learns from experience of others that say "i installed an aftermarket cat and it doesn't work right"
But how would a vacuum port be useful on OBDI and OBDII vehicles? And emission places are testing more then for a carb running too rich. 5 gas analyzers are a waste with OBDII systems, maybe that why they dont use them on that system.
dyeager535 said:
The category is "GM TBI" and this is "Colorado K5".
see above about my mention of discussion EFI vs carb tools.
Really, this is colorado k5? people shouldn't be talking in the off topic sections. What? This is the GM TBI category? Looks like your way off topic by flaming me for your lack of knowledge in the automotive field.
dyeager535 said:
YOU said " break out box 300 dollars" not labscope. How is a continuity test not "real time"? How is data that is transferred at 160 or 8192 baud, and captured for review, any less valid than "real time" data? What exactly IS "real time" if winALDL displaying the engine running isn't?
Looks to me i said labscope, even look on the previous page
"labscope more then 1000 bucks You cant diagnose a majority of sensors with a multimeter"
pst, reading comprehension
a human brain cant perceive information that quick and a multimeter and scantool do not display "all" information. Let me know if you can comprehend the miliseconds on a stop watch. Someone who is an electrical eng. rely on oscilliscopes for their work, not multimeters.
dyeager535 said:
Re-reading your post, no, you didn't. As a matter of fact, you didn't bother clarifying at all. So you have already diagnosed the original poster with an emissions failure? I don't see why you'd be bring up a "temp sensor" (what kind was it again?) for emissions failure if you didn't already think that was his problem. Or are you TRYING to prove how much real world experience you have, and how little I presumably have?
what happened to your great reading comprehension. You had to reread my post. Sad sad sad.
In my tools for EFI systems, i state a tool to read temperature. So now where are you getting "temp sensor" ?
We already know you have no real world experience. Remember, you hear about peoples experiences of CAT installations. LOL
dyeager535 said:
As a matter of fact, can you explain to me how my carbed 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass Salon (or any carbed emissions control vehicle) has any less of a requirement for this "temp sensor" to diagnose emissions failure than the posters 1992 TBI setup? I apparently don't understand the different emissions components that GM apparently added to the 1992 setup over mine, which wouldn't require this "temp sensor" for expert diagnosis.
where are you getting this temp sensor? This is the 2nd time.
Please, quote me where i state anything about a temp sensor. Talk about making stuff up.
dyeager535 said:
Well since you lack the need to read, you wouldn't know that is the price for factory parts that are produced, installed and sold for a mass produced automobile by one of the US big three, would you? Now you do. Go tell them their factory warranteed engine components are crummy.
huh?
Did you get confused about me pointing out the fact that you buy the cheapest aftermarket parts to replace OEM injectors?
dyeager535 said:
Lets see. Work on own vehicle. $200 for new injectors when mine ohm out bad, or pay $1000 for tool to test injectors which will undoubtedly find I have bad injectors. Hmm, tough choice there.
what tool costs 1000 bucks that only test injectors?
dyeager535 said:
Dang, and here I thought all the information I was posting was something I knew. Was there somewhere that I made a blanket statement saying injectors needed to be removed to test? Let me re-read my post....nope, I never said that.
dyeager535 said:
We can also pull the fuel rail (or injector pod, etc) and prime the engine and see if it leaks
look, you say it right here. You cant even remember what you typed. ROFL
dyeager535 said:
Once again, did I say I wasn't into electronics,? Did I say ANYTHING about starting a vehicle with the injectors pulled? Damn, do I need to go back to the catalytic converter post and explain everything verbatim to you there as well? Because you certainly have a problem with reading comprehension, and thats not meant to be an insult, it's the truth. If you care to read before posting again, please do us a favor and take the time to re-read my posts and let the info sink in before responding.
dyeager535 said:
If it's present at idle, unplugging the injector will also help prove where the fault lies.
another quote from your mouth. Must be from my poor reading comprehension.
I do know you said your not in electronics. That is why you lack any sense working on an electronic system on a vehicle.
Nope, stop right there. No more discussion of cats. Because i dont need you quoting other peoples experiences of installing aftermarket CATs. ROFL
dyeager535 said:
A "short" in a TPS huh? Please explain to me how either watching the voltmeter or winALDL display as the throttle position sensor lever is worked slowly through its travel, won't reveal a problem with a TPS. Since you can't answer that anyways, because you can test it that way, I'll save you the trouble. Why are there minimum and maximum TPS *voltages* listed in the service manual (read) if thats not how you test it?
Remember i stated, scantools and multimeters dont have real time display.
Min and Max voltage values are just 1 way to test a sensor. But isn't your first point of this paragraph talking about finding a short. Did you forget what you typed 2 sentences ago? And your not in electronics, so you lack the education of shorts in resistors.
dyeager535 said:
No kidding? There are some things you can't do with a multimeter? Come on, theres a reason scantools/winALDL exist. What kind of drive the ecm has? What the hell are you talking about? You mean injector drivers? Do you mean injector pulse width? What??
exactly, what. go look it up on the internet, like you always do.
Pst, what a pussy way to get out of a argument. What happened to your statement that multimeters can be used to fix everything on EFI?
Or the statement about "i dont care how a sensor operates" hypocrite
dyeager535 said:
For all that can stomach this much of this thread, and are still following along, WE ARE DEALING WITH A 1992 GM TBI SYSTEM INSTALLED IN A 1986 BLAZER. We are not talking about shops, we are not talking about customers, we are talking about one guy trying to fix his vehicle. YOU are trying to get in a pissing match about how much more expensive you perceive EFI diagnosis to be than carbed. Your blanket statements do nothing but make it impossible to defend the "information" you post.
this is the 2nd time your using that old argument trying to prove that you dont have a small penis.
My topic is about EFI tools vs Carb tools. But you keep on going on and on off topic if this is truly about TBI systems and not your low self esteem.
dyeager535 said:
Lets review your posts, shall we? (BTW, who says I don't have a college education?) Not edited, not taken out of context, "full sentences" as written by you:
Your lack of knowledge proves you dont have a college education.
dyeager535 said:
We can also pull the fuel rail (or injector pod, etc) and prime the engine and see if it leaks.
my sentences, pst. Look, you got me over at your house checking the fuel rail.
dyeager535 said:
Nowhere that I see does the poster mention anything about hot rodding the engine or making major changes. If 1992 is "older" to you, what is new? 5 minutes ago? What is his truck being a 1986? I like how the pros are "good for new cars or on a new engine" and "great for turbo". So either a new setup in a new vehicle, or an old setup on a new engine are both appropriate for EFI, and thats it? Oh wait, can't forget turbo setups.
He didn't. DUH. Those are examples of the pros and cons of EFI and Carb systems.
dyeager535 said:
Bringing up another (old by now) thread where I chose to let you wallow in your own ignorance and incomprehension is pretty ridiculous. I realized at that point (as I already have in this thread) that no matter what you are presented with for information, if it disagrees with you, you dismiss it. Excuse me if I refuse to let you think you know it all from now on. I won't stand by and let you post mis-information, and slander proven fuel delivery systems because of your lack of understanding. I'm not defending myself here, I'm hoping that other people will realize that what you have posted is far from reality. Whether conciously or not, in this case you are obviously trying to foist carbs upon the people reading, and that is not right.
blah blah, self esteem issues Pst, your not defending yourself. What are you doing then?
dyeager535 said:
It's really sad that you can't have a positive discussion where you and everyone else might actually learn something, instead of resorting to name calling, insults, and an attitude of "I'm always right, regardless of what information I'm presented with". You WILL eventually learn that blanket statements do everyone a disservice.
People did learn something about the pros and cons of EFI and carb systems. Also the cost of diagnostic tools. And a bonus, they learned you have no clue about how to diagnose cars. I bet they would all be willing for you to work on their car. "oh oh deyeager, just change all the sensors, maybe that will fix the check engine light"
dyeager535 said:
I don't believe you posted a single fact that disproves anything I presented here, and thats a waste of everyones time. If I'm wrong, prove it, I'll learn something, and so might others. You have given me no reason to believe that I have underestimated you experience or intelligence up to this point though.
People learned here today on the date of March 8, 2005, that you, dyeager, diagnose cars by replacing sensors instead of doing it the right way.
Oh let me get a few quotes of you being wrong or misinformed I had a good laugh at you not knowing what is a break out box. ROFL
dyeager535 said:
Ok, from what I can see, it's a multimeter that checks a variety of plugs, or something along those lines that my GM service manual doesn't call for to diagnose EFI problems? In any case, a multimeter easily checks wires for continuity, and winALDL tells you what the sensor readings are. -$300
priceless
did they forgot to mention: screwdrivers, sockets, wrenches, ratchets etc...
in the gm service manual too?
LOL, it's a multimeter you need a better search engine
Lets look at your experience with Cats. another good one. You know more then me. ROFL
dyeager535 said:
You also hear people having problems sometimes with aftermarket converters after relatively short periods of time (either coming apart or smelling tremendously) which COULD be related to improper placement. Improper tune is just as likely a cause though. Lots of variables, hard to prove one way or another.
LOL improper placement causing smell. ROFL OMG wiping tears away, that is so funny. Do you hear people say you smell? LOL
LOL your mechanic experience "you also hear people" must not be first hand
are you going to tell me all those tools dont cost what they do. Or change the point of my arguement because you're a loser? My topic "EFI tools" not shadetree dyeager tools. Are you going to snap on's website and inform me that those fuel pressure set doesn't cost what they do. I know they dont, they prob cost more then what i mentioned.
Or tell me that you can use a multimeter on all sensors. Even, sensors that use frequency as output to the ECM. Or how winaldl will provide enough output to help determine the operation of a sensor? Dyeager doing diagnostics "wow, the voltage of this 02 sensor is moving around on my laptop, that must mean it is working properly"
I cant wait for your next post. What is it gonna be. You quoting every word i say and saying, a multimeter can fix it? ROFL