surpip said:
that means if ya doint weld the **** together right, when you crash you will die cause the cage will collapse
That's actually pretty accurate.
I'm just talking about proper use of triangles where you can, combined with "nodes" for joints where possible. The ideal is that you want to build your cage from triangles with straight sides. Ever notice how you can create a triangle with ball joints at all 4 points, then grab the points, and you can't distort the shape? Try that with any other 2D geometry and it will flop around all over the place. Now imagine you built your cage from a bunch of triangles and all the points of all the triangles meet at the same points. These points would be called "nodes".
Now further imagine that your cage built from triangles, connected together at nodes so it has the shape a cage should have, gets hit hard right above the driver’s door by a boulder in a hard roll. That bar will undoubtedly deform, probably flatten and bend inward a bit, BUT (and here is the key), for it to bend very far the ends of the bar must get closer together! Shortest distance between 2 points and all that. If the bar is not straight, and the length of metal remains roughly constant, the end points MUST get closer together.
But remember those nodes at all the end points? The nodes that connect triangles together? For that bending bar to get bent very far, those *nodes* have to come together (assuming the welds or material does not fail altogether). Which means your pulling those other rigid triangles around by their nodes. So what you have done is convert bending loads (tube FAR weaker in bending) to linear compressive/tensile (stretching) loads along the tubes that form the triangles (and tube is MUCH MUCH stronger with these loads). Furthermore, because the triangle shape itself is rigid if you don’t deform the tube (through a bending load generally) you transfer those forces through out the cage, which has now become something known structurally as a “space frame”.
But note the earlier qualifiers "where you can" and "where possible", that's part of the compromise between full on pro cages and what you find in a trail rig. In the real world, a typical rig (even for comp) will make some compromises for ease of access to seats, storage, maintenance, etc. And you won’t be able to have all your tubes straight, or ideally oriented triangles to transfer forces perfectly. So you’ll wind up with some bent tube (in a proper bender), and some squares where triangles might be better, but by knowing what your looking for you can build a MUCH stronger cage that is lighter than a cage that will not hold up as well.
So, triangulate and use “nodes” to transfer energy where you can, and compromise where you must. And the MOST important place of all is in the b-hoop (arch behind the front seats) to keep the whole cage from folding over in a side hit (like the all too typical open “box” cage can do). This happened to one of the AZ guys when his Land Cruiser went over on the way to a trail. Power slide on a dirt road at 20ish mph, caught a burm, did a hard flop (don’t even think he went all the way over, maybe 3/4(?)) and his square box of a cage now is a trapezoid offset on the top by about 8”. No doubt saved his life, and it had done slow flops before with no major issue, but a simple diagonal on the b-hoop would have kept it serviceable after that hard flop…