I hate making blanket statements, but my understanding is that any GM vehicle with rear disks runs that setup. (drum in hat) It has been used "for a long time" (in car years) on the Camaro's, never heard of a problem with it.
IMO almost all problems experienced with rear disks are related to people not actually using the ebrake. Whether old school Cadillac calipers or new drum in hat, the people that more often than not don't use the ebrake will have problems with them.
Of course I have no concrete proof this is why GM would go back to rear drums, but I can guarantee, whether it was a design flaw, or something caused by owners, GM would still change to something that would keep people from having/causing problems.
I know the new Astros that are 6 lug/10 bolt (8.5") use 13" REAR rotors, which are even bigger than the front, so I would expect a bigger, heavier truck to use similar size, if not larger. 12" brake setups typically barely clear 15" wheels, I can see something designed for 16" or bigger wheels not fitting at all.
Again according to TSM's site, the new 1/2 ton stuff ('88+ except our body style I guess) uses the same axle flange as the 14SF and 14FF. Anything that used rear disk on an 8.5" axle before 16" wheels got so common, MIGHT be a donor. Only things I can think of that may fit that bill are the few 8.5" S10's that were in production, and the Astro's, but Astro's were typically 7.5".