350, 383 dyno proven recipes

[Mad-Dog]

Here is a link to dozens of 350 and 383 dyno proven recipes that will clear up any doubts that you may have (surpip)


http://www.ryanscarpage.50megs.com/combos1.html

 

[Hogback Fabrication]

Wow, #19 is almost exactly my engine. Same cam, distributor, pistons, compression ratio, but a 750 CFM modded Quadrajet and vortec heads. I don't think mine quite makes peak power up that high though. Nice post!

 

[tiger9297]

Great post. Very helpful as I am in the process of planning a new engine build.

 

[Jonny-K5]

i remember seeing this site awhile back. and i was just wondering where i could find it. good timing

 

[surpip]

Here is a link to dozens of 350 and 383 dyno proven recipes that will clear up any doubts that you may have (surpip)


http://www.ryanscarpage.50megs.com/combos1.html

why was this directed at me?

 

[Mad-Dog]

In response to the thread about "350 vs 383 reliability" and "Dirtwarrior17's comments, no pun intended surpip.....just wanted you to see for yourself how a 350 stacks up against a 383.

 

[surpip]

Ya? So it looks like i was right similar build 383VS. 350. 383 makes more power

 

[Smitty]

Some great info! I sure could have used this info last year. It will make it easier on the next one!

 

[Mad-Dog]

Yes it does and at a lower rpm, i think the message that DW17 was trying to convey was that 2 similar builds of a 350 and 383 will make similar HP but the 383 will always make more torque because of the 1/4" longer stroke.

 

[BigBurban350]

Eeek, those 5.565 rods on the 383's give me the willys.

 

[sled_dog]

5.565 is stock 400 I believe.

 

[Hogback Fabrication]

5.565 rods are stock in a 400, but some people put them in 383's (they get the 400 crank and take the rods with it). This is really too short of a rod and 5.7" rods are so easy to come by that they are usually replaced with them.

 

[BigBurban350]

All the better with 6" rods

 

[MTMike]

Great info! Thanks!

Combo 5 sounds alot like my engine w/ the huge cam and all.... The P.O. told me the compression is above 9.5:1 but I've yet to verify that.

-Mike