CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

44" bogger height?

jekbrown

I am CK5
 Premium
GMOTM Winner
Author
Joined
May 19, 2001
Posts
46,254
Reaction score
2,869
Location
TEXAS
anyone know the actual height of a 44" Bogger mounted on a 15x10 rim? Someone on pirate said they are 'pretty much' 42" tall... since the 42" irok is tall for its nominal height, I thought maybe I could run 44 boggers in back and 42 Iroks in front. :D anyone measured 'em?

j
 
I could get a measurement from a 12-14" wide wheel..
Bogger's need at least a 12" wide wheel....so someone with a 10" wheel is gonna be hard to find. ;)
 
I have a set on 16.5 x 12's but I will have to get a measurement after work. BTW I sold my old 44x19.5X15 boggers to a guy that mounted them on 15 x 8'S :eek1: They looked sick on those wheels.
 
yeah, no reason you can't put a 44 bogger on 10" wide rims... as mentioned, there are peeps who run them on 8s.

43"+ on a 16.5" rim eh? hmm... not lookin good. lol!

j
 
Why not boggers rear, and TSL's up front? I still dont understand this IROK craze myself..........
 
joez said:
Why not boggers rear, and TSL's up front? I still dont understand this IROK craze myself..........
That is a great combo when mud bogging. Easier to steer with the tsls up front & great traction in the rear.
 
That, and TSL's actually work. I have yet to be impressed by a single rig i have seen running IROK's, especially in any kind of mud.
 
justinf said:
I don't understand it either, the TSL's are more attractive for the simple fact of more tread depth.

on 42" iroks the tread depth is the same as a 42" TSL... it was the 39.5s that are "bald" from the factory...

j
 
hmmm.. good point. Not really 'bald' compared to the 39.5s though... just 20/32 on them...

j
 
because the Irocks were cheaper than the tsl's. I have had both and I cant tell a differance in mud
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom