big_truxx
1/2 ton status
I was just thinking today and was wondering if the 56" spring in the front would be the same amount of lift as the 52" or more?
should be about 4 inches, the samebig_truxx said:Anyone know?



mmmmwwwwwuuuuahgahahahaha It all makes sense now. Thanks!
Now for some 56" 12" lift for the front of the 84 and a 4" shackle flip and 12" rear 56" springs for the rear....

big_truxx said:Bro! You have no idea how happy this new fountain of knowledge makes the mad scientist today!!!mmmmwwwwwuuuuahgahahahaha It all makes sense now. Thanks!
Now for some 56" 12" lift for the front of the 84 and a 4" shackle flip and 12" rear 56" springs for the rear....
![]()
![]()
white-rhyno said:why? running 52" tires or better??
But look at my avatar...
I would love to have something similar in my driveway. Also I figured the only way to run 44's was 12" springs and 3" body. Now I found about the miracle shackle flips and bigger front springs... opens a whole new world
But then again I doubt that I could get away with that much lift as far as the law is concerned so it would be very impractical
stoopid lift laws
the law says that the frame has to be a certain hight from the ground
why not toss another frame in there?
I will never move since I like my quality of life here too much. And must be willing to make sacrafices for that.Nonesuch said:I doubt you will get 4" of lift out of stock 56" springs up front. The stock ~48" up front are a slight negative arch and the 56" springs have very little positive arch. You may gain ~2" depending on the number of leaves in the pack. When I installed my 56" springs in the rear, I gained zero lift, actually lost a little. The reason you get 4" of lift in the rear when using 56" springs is due to a shackle flip 98% of the time. The 56" springs in the front of my buddies rig netted him very little lift. He achieved most of his lift by building custom spring hangers at the framehorn as seen in the link below below.
And that's odd as other people say they have a 4" lift from both 52" and 56" spring swaps to their front end. I know that the rear is attributed to a shackle flip
I guess I will have to go look under my dually and see how much positive arch that has. I would think it best to put "matching" springs in the front. So if I have 52" rear I would go with 52" front and same with 56". Just the way I look at it though.
wouldn't work even with copy and paste for me
But anyway... Maybe I missread someone else's post
If that's the case with the 56" fronts I think that the 52" would be much better. But maybe I am thinking of different 56" spring packs also. I keep forgetting there are variations for them. I just always think of the big pack under my duallies 
\86chevybanshee said:yea maine has very stupid lift laws, my old truck was lifted 6 inches with 35" boggers on it and i got hosed with a 300$ ticket,this was in berwick maine, but i got out of it cuz i lived in mass