CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

Back In the Saddle Again

don't forget you have 2 different metals for top and 2nd ring. I am sure that's why they have different specs for gap
I told him what rings I’m using. He’s been building race engines for 40 years. He definitely knows his stuff. But I think I’ll just play it safe and go with the specs I listed earlier. I’m just excited I found a good machinist in town I can trust.
 
W/ @Wes Harden

Who needs a special puller when you have redneck engineers on hand?

Cam degreed, pistons installed, rod bearings clearanced, new adjustable timing gear installed. Now time to do the top end! Soaking my lifters now. Need to run and grab some play dough.

IMG_9333.jpeg

IMG_9334.jpeg

IMG_9335.jpeg

IMG_9338.jpeg

IMG_9341.jpeg
 
Heads torqued, valve train assembled. Waiting on a truck oil pan and need to pick a water pump.

Then I need to dish out the cash for a Daytona sensors ignition control module and pick up some coils.

But all the hard stuff is done.
Really like these engines. Honestly they are so simple even compared to an old Small Block. The design makes these an absolute breeze to throw together.

IMG_9361.jpegIMG_9362.jpeg
 
I thought drilling some holes in the valve covers really helped with the oil consumption.
I have seen that also. The rings supposedly are just bad at sealing and let them burn oil. Trying to get less piston drag is what I have heard. Had a couple 5.3s and 6.0s at work and the Chevy dealer says 2 qts consumption per oil change depending on use is normal.
My wife's 6.2L just broke 286k this weekend though, leaks and burns lots of oil. Just gotta keep her topped off.
 
Puting rings on this 5.3 with stock pistons, I can say the rings are much narrower than a Gen 1 sbc, also thinner. I bet the rings rock in the lands quit a bit, even with in specs
 
I have a '04 Tahoe with a 5.3 (LM7) and 130k miles and it doesn't use a drop of oil between oil changes. Not sure what happened with the newer versions, but burning 2 qts is unacceptable.
 
I have a '04 Tahoe with a 5.3 (LM7) and 130k miles and it doesn't use a drop of oil between oil changes. Not sure what happened with the newer versions, but burning 2 qts is unacceptable.
All newer vehicles seem to have that problem for some reason and apparently it's considered normal and acceptable.
Even Toyota and Honda that I know from personal experience. I guess using less gas means more oil.
 
My 2016 2.5 Toyota engine only uses @1/2 quart in 5k miles. It has just under 80k total milage
 
My old L83 would go through 2-3qts in 5k miles. Had a 160k on it. Much to the internet’s disbelief, a catch can caught very little and did nothing for the consumption.
 
Ordered the Daytona Sensors Smart Spark Ignition control module. oil pan should be here this week too.

Now I need to figure out what fly wheel to run in front of the NV4500
 
Ordered the Daytona Sensors Smart Spark Ignition control module. oil pan should be here this week too.

Now I need to figure out what fly wheel to run in front of the NV4500
Seeing as how you could get a genIII 6.0 in a gmt800 2500 truck with a nv4500, I’d look there first. Get the pilot bearing for the same application too.
 
Seeing as how you could get a genIII 6.0 in a gmt800 2500 truck with a nv4500, I’d look there first. Get the pilot bearing for the same application too.
I was looking at them on rock auto. So I should use a 5.7l flywheel you think?
 
I was looking at them on rock auto. So I should use a 5.7l flywheel you think?
Are you building a 6.0 or 5.3?
I could be wrong but I thought the 5.7 had a different crank bolt pattern than the LS engines
 
Top Bottom