CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

Bilstein 5125 vs. Skyjacker M95

cheavyk10

Award Tour
 Premium
GMOTM Winner
Joined
Sep 20, 2019
Posts
2,670
Reaction score
7,240
Location
Centralia Washington
So one of the Pro-Comp MX-6's on the front of my K10 blew a seal and leaked out all the fluid. Only about 5 years old if I remember correctly. Since these are no longer available I was looking at some replacements. I will definitely stick to a mono-tube style shock.

I know the Bilsteins are tried and true and a lot of you guys have run them, but does anybody have experience with the Skyjacker M95 's?
They are similar price point, and it looks like I should be able to get the lengths I need.

I don't really feel like I should need to upgrade to some Foxes with remote reservoirs or anything crazy/expensive.
 
Last edited:
Just curious, what springs do you have? That should let us know what is really needed or how you want to use the truck
 
Currently I have 4" Tuff Country EZ rides in the front (that have been on the truck since 2001),
and some worn out factory 52s in the rear.
I would love to go with some custom ORDs this year if the funds allow it.
 
Skip the 5125 and go straight to 7100. Get the slower valving if you are contemplating softer springs. The mounting uses heim joints, which might be a negative for your use, it wasn’t for me. Plus the 7100 is available in slightly slower valving than the 5125.

That’s my only experience with shocks and on 52/56” leaves.
 
Top Bottom