This is one reason i find sye kits kinda odd. Think about how few miles my blazer prolly has on the front end as opposed to the rear, and the splines are sloppy as heck. Why would you want that in the rear where it will only go bad faster? Or are splines for rear driveahafts stronger for some reason
Well, I don't have an answer I can prove, but I can tell you this.
My 79 150 had the spline in the rear shaft, as does my 89 250.
I think I replaced the rear spline about twice in 200K on the 79, and so far none on the 89 with about 150K.
The reason for twice on the 150, was because it came from the factory with the spline on the diff end and got lots of mud and water.
With the second replacement, I got smart and had my machine shop guy move it to the top and never had to do it again.
My 250 has it there to start with, because I had to redo the shaft when I put in the NP205.
On both trucks, I have replaced the front driveshaft several times.
I know for a fact that there is no difference on hardness between the two, because my guy uses the same parts to fix front and rear shafts.
So why do they wear out? I have a theory.
First, in most cases a front end suspension goes up and down a lot more than the rear. More loading, so the spline moves a lot more.
Second, and I think this is the most important, the rear spline is under torque at all times.
Back in the day, when GM had the idea that people were too stupid to shift transfer cases and came out with full time 4wd, I almost never saw a bad front shaft.
When someone put in a part time kit, the shafts started wearing out.
When the shaft is under torque, it is held rigid. When there is no load on it, it is free to "hinge" at the spline.
Plus, often it does not rotate for long periods of time, so it flexes at the same place.
So bouncing up and down the road wears it out.
As an example, to check a front spline, you often push up on it, and it flops. Sliding back and forth would not cause slop in that direction, bending up and down does.