CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

CUCV Axle Questions...

DirtyDan

Newbie
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Posts
4
Reaction score
0
Location
St. Louis, MO
While looking on a gov. auction site that had several CUCV blazers for sale, I noticed 2 of them were listed as 5/4 ton. From everything I have read, the blazers were 3/4 ton (they had those listed too). Did they make a 5/4 ton CUCV blazer w/ the D60/corp14?

Any Input... ?
 
DirtyDan said:
While looking on a gov. auction site that had several CUCV blazers for sale, I noticed 2 of them were listed as 5/4 ton. From everything I have read, the blazers were 3/4 ton (they had those listed too). Did they make a 5/4 ton CUCV blazer w/ the D60/corp14?

Any Input... ?


If I'm correct; it mean 1.25 tons; AND YES THEY DID MAKE THEM. I have a CUCV D60 FRONT AXLES FOR MY RIG.
 
As I recall, that's just an incorrect listing. The trucks were 5/4 tons, the blazers were listed as 3/4 ton.
 
I cant recall seeing a M1009(blazer) have 1 ton axles. Ive always seen 10bolts under them.

Someone wanna prove me wrong?
 
Citizen Rider said:
I cant recall seeing a M1009(blazer) have 1 ton axles. Ive always seen 10bolts under them.

Someone wanna prove me wrong?

nope ur right.
 
Well shucks... I just bought it. The listing states that it is 5/4 ton, but it is definately a blazer, and there are no pics of the wheels to count the lug nuts. It was cheap enough and close to home, but I was wanting the axles for my Jeep Scrambler :eek1:.

It will probally be forsale as soon as she gets home then :(
 
DirtyDan said:
Well shucks... I just bought it. The listing states that it is 5/4 ton, but it is definately a blazer, and there are no pics of the wheels to count the lug nuts. It was cheap enough and close to home, but I was wanting the axles for my Jeep Scrambler :eek1:.

It will probally be forsale as soon as she gets home then :(

is it complete and running? if so i might be interested depending on the condition
 
Citizen Rider said:
I cant recall seeing a M1009(blazer) have 1 ton axles. Ive always seen 10bolts under them.

Someone wanna prove me wrong?

Not to mention...the M1009's had 10 bolts with 3.08 gears.:doah:

I currently have a 5/4 ton 14FF in my k5. The military surplus store I bought it at said it islisted as 5/4 ton because of the added strength of the Detroit locker. Maybe also the 4.56's too:dunno:
-Harrison
 
Truck will be moved to zip code 63129. It is currently in Lebanon MO. If anybody wants this thing, and want to pick it up in Lebanon MO, they can have it for what I paid for it. $701. If I get it and bring it home to St. Louis I'll need a few $ more to pay for fuel. The truck is paid for, if anyone wants to pick it up, email me [email protected]
 
It's not anything to do with a locker, it's how much weight they were rated for. Springs and all that are either more stout than civilian one tons, and/or the military actually got closer to what the vehicles are capable of, not limited to a weight specified for liability/warranty issues. :)
 
Yep, the M1009 is 6 lug 10 bolt, 3.08, 6.2L diesel and the Military rated them as 3/4 ton. The M1008 has 3/4 or 1 ton axles.
 
dyeager535 said:
It's not anything to do with a locker, it's how much weight they were rated for. Springs and all that are either more stout than civilian one tons, and/or the military actually got closer to what the vehicles are capable of, not limited to a weight specified for liability/warranty issues. :)
Ahhh thanks. Learn something new everyday.
-Harrison
 
dyeager535 said:
It's not anything to do with a locker, it's how much weight they were rated for. Springs and all that are either more stout than civilian one tons, and/or the military actually got closer to what the vehicles are capable of, not limited to a weight specified for liability/warranty issues. :)

You have the right idea. The military was simply basing the ratings on what the trucks could actually haul........however that does not mean it was any different than a civilian truck. The terms "1/2 ton", "3/4 ton", and "1 ton" are really old terms that haven't got used a lot officially by the manufacturers for years. At one time they referred to the actual load the truck could handle, but in general the load capacities of those trucks have exceeded those numbers but the "1/2 ton", etc... has stuck simply as a way to differeniate between the different levels of truck. It's kinda' like how a lot of people will generically refer to any cola as a "Coke". Heck, an '06 Chevy 1500 (which people would call a half-ton) has a payload capacity of at least 1,500 pounds........so should we really call it a 3/4 ton?
 
Top Bottom