CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

Does anyone run a 2bbl carb?

I did some testing in the early 80s trying to get more milage. Better off with a 4 barrel with small primaries and stay out of the secondaries. I disconnected the secondaries and the milage went up a little. Don't remember how much though.
 
I currently run a q jet and do love em. Just heard lots of good stories about 2bbl carbs. This one being a rochester would be an easy straight forward swap. I see 2bbl manifolds on cl all the time
 
This was 30 years ago, so my memory is faded a little.

The 2 bbl had much bigger jets than the primaries on the 4 bbl. so basic milage is better at lower rpm's. The 2 bbl gives steady HP thought the rpm's. But the 4 bbl is just so much more fun to drive.
 
Its debateable whether a 2 bbl will save you any gas,because most have 2 fairly large barrels that are bigger than most 4 barrel carbs primaries are...
I've gotten better mpg from a 4 bbl ,a Q-jet or spread bore Holley will beat most 2 bbl carbs if you dont boot the secondaries in ...I liked the model 4360 Holley "Economaster" 4 bbl carbs,they would deliver up to 18 mpg on my 74 C10 that had a 454 in it...the Carter AFB's and Edelbrocks have very little difference in the primary and secondary barrels,but still can do pretty well on gas if jetted right...

I've used the smaller version of the 2GC Rochester carb used on 283's and 307's with good mpg,I could squeeze 16-18 mpg from my 81 G10 van with a 73 chevelle 307 with that carb,that has 1-1/4" barrels,but it has 2.73 axle gears so that probably helps a lot......the larger ones (1-1/2" barrels) were used on 327's and 350's and would burn as much gas as a 4 barrel carb ,they were popular on dirt track cars here,most were resticted to using a 2 bbl,so those and the Holley 2 barrels like Fords used factory were a common carb on many race cars on local tracks...

I've noticed most smaller V8's actually ran better with 2 barrels ,after I bought a manifold and a 4 bbl to swap onto them...the smaller displacement engines dont like a big open hole when you boot all 4 barrels in,the air velocity suffers and the engine bogs, or lays an egg instead of operating at full efficiency...a 390 cfm 4 bbl Holley works pretty well on them,but anything larger is a waste of gas,it wont add any power really..

One guy I know tried putting a one barrel carb off a 250 six by using an old 1 barrel to 2 barrel adapter he found at a swap meet for 5 bucks...said it runs OK,but is sluggish as far as acceleration,and so far its not much better on gas than his original 2 bbl was,on a '67 283 in an Impala...he wants to find a smaller one barrel,but I warned him he may start hearing spark knock and do some damage by running it too lean....

There isn't much you can do to a V8 to get it over 15 mpg in a full sized vehicle...the only exception to this I've witnessed was a neighbors '76 Lincoln that had a 460 with a factory Autolite 4 bbl,it would deliver up to 20 mpg,but he knew how to DRIVE it too....with that big an engine you only need to open the throttle a crack past idle...seen some 500 caddy engines do very well on gas if driven like grandma too...

I think the GAS they sell us is responsible for the poor mpg today,alcohol has less btu's and you need to burn more to get the same amount of power compared to straight gasoline...plus older engines were not designed to run on fuels suited better for todays fuel injected engines...
 
The best mileage I got from my 79 Chevy 350 was with a qjet with the secondary spring adjusted a little tighter so they only opened under heavy load.
I got an average 18 mpg in a 2wd van.
 
Well mind you this is an 85 burb, so I don't have super high expectations. I don't hot rod it around town but I do a lot of stop and go city driving and Portland has a lot of hills.

Maybe I should just find a used TBI set up
 
I had a 500 edelbrock on my last burb (3/4 4x4 350 and a 4 spd) and with it jetted properly, got a pretty consistent 13mpg. WFO power was slightly less than the q jet, but driveability was very good.
 
I understand. Actually seems to be around 12 is all right now. But like i said, my computer is still being a weirdo. Need to get that taken care of but i cant really mess with it until i get it re-repainted. I think, if it was all good like it should be, i would expect 12 in town and 15 on the highway. Yours being a 4 speed i would expect 13 in town and 16 highway. Thats just being realistic. With a good canned tune, free flowing exhaust, aftermarket intake tube etc, i would not be surprised to see 18 highway with your 4 speed as long as you have no taller than 3.73 gears. So not any kind of MPG king, but what i like most about these motors is just the way they run! They just run exactly how you want them to all hte time. Perfect drive-ability. and they were just so smartly engineered.
 
4BT swap? talk about fuel miser

even a rotary 6bt can get 20s easy

That would be bad ass. Its funny, but compared to an LS swap, a cummins swap seems like an expensive, time consuming swap. But you get what you pay for. :whistle:


What was that quote about thread derailing at ck5 again??? :haha:
 
Cummins swap would run me more than twice what I paid for the rig. Could buy a lot of gas with that money...I guess if I ever kept anything long enough I might actually recoup the money.
 
Last edited:
Again, I'm fully aware I drive a huge brick around town. And city driving brings the suck for mileage in just about any truck. Just kicking around some little tweaks for the time being
 
I disconnected the odometer and use my GPS for speed. I get at least 30mpg. Nobody can prove me wrong.
 
I had a 500 edelbrock on my last burb (3/4 4x4 350 and a 4 spd) and with it jetted properly, got a pretty consistent 13mpg. WFO power was slightly less than the q jet, but driveability was very good.

You know I don't mind edelbrocks for the street. In fact I had a 600 edelbrock on my ol' 82 and when I switched it over to a q jet I didn't see any change in mileage. The edel started great cold or hot, but man, so much as put a tire on a curb and it sputtered and coughed. Its a flat lander carb. I'll never use one off road. Qjet all the way or efi
 
I think the best thing you can do for justt little stuff is a full distributor tune, tune up, and carb re build.
 
I think the best thing you can do for justt little stuff is a full distributor tune, tune up, and carb re build.

Yeah, that's on the list somewhere near the top. Along with all the other boring and practical things. Man, I used to do lift wheels and tires damn near before I opened the hood. Lol!
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom