dirtwarrior17 said:
I got it off ebay. Came with camel hump heads, edelbrock manifold, 10:1 compression speedpro flat tops, clevite bearings, moly rings, L-79 cam, and hydraulic lifters for $1535
You have an engine built on 35 year old technology. Basicallly, you wasted your money. A more modern camshaft and cylinder heads, and a lower compression ratio would have yielded a more streetable engine with more power that'd run on 87 octane. Yours is going to knock like a Diesel and those ancient heads and cam are really killing your power vs. the new stuff.
The other mistake you made is taking someone's word for it on Ebay. I can't possibly think of a worse way to buy a performance engine than Ebay. Obviously you've never done any machine work in your life. It's not easy, and if you screw up the parts, they're generally garbage. That is, unless you sell engines on ebay. CHA-CHING!!! Anything that you screwed up, or is less than desireable, you can just sell on ebay.......
Lol a ram jet 350 is a fat RIP OFF. I have a reman 355 with better numbers for 3 grand less.
Coming from a guy that just threw money at an engine with 35 year old parts, those are very strong words. Compared to what you wasted your money on, a ramjet 350 has more power, is more fuel efficient, and has better torque from idle on up than yours will have given the current parts selection.
I just read the posts you made lower in the thread. It looks like you made a fool of yourself and proved your ignorance, which means all the stuff I typed out above is probably already really clear to everyone.
The stock 350 will push a stock burb with a couple kids in the back up a hill just fine. If it didn't GM would have used a different engine.
Sure will. Gearing will give it more mechanical advantage against the wheels than a more torquey engine will.
Do we have a new Timmay on ck5? Too bad there's not an active band director around here.
No, even I think this wanker is a tool. At least most of the time I know what I'm talking about.