According to THIS link, you are correct (dyeager) that the split between pulse modulated operation and simple on/off operation was dictated by GVWR application (under 8500lbs uses on/off and a simple solenoid, 8500+lbs uses PWM and a EVRV).
So here's the catch: both applications (heavy and light) used a 1227747 ECM.
I am starting to think that the ECM in my Blazer may have been replaced somewhere along the way with a previous owner, and it may now have a "heavy" ECM...which has the exact same service number as the "light" ECM but a different EGR control method!
I do not know if the difference in EGR output is configured by the .bin file aboard the PROM and uses the same switching hardware aboard the ECM (don't see why it couldn't...). I suspect it is, and if so I could fix it by simply swapping the PROM out.
I don't own an oscilloscope, but I suspect Fordum may be correct. My LED rig burns dimly/flickers which is sorta consistent with a PWM signal.
So here's the catch: both applications (heavy and light) used a 1227747 ECM.
I am starting to think that the ECM in my Blazer may have been replaced somewhere along the way with a previous owner, and it may now have a "heavy" ECM...which has the exact same service number as the "light" ECM but a different EGR control method!

I do not know if the difference in EGR output is configured by the .bin file aboard the PROM and uses the same switching hardware aboard the ECM (don't see why it couldn't...). I suspect it is, and if so I could fix it by simply swapping the PROM out.

I don't own an oscilloscope, but I suspect Fordum may be correct. My LED rig burns dimly/flickers which is sorta consistent with a PWM signal.
Last edited:

