Sure it does. City gets more tax money. Another unending cycle, since taxes are always raised. If more taxpayers meant more money, it would go the other way. I can't say my standard of living is any better just because I've got 50% more traffic lights in my area.
That's what allows sprawl to happen...greedy cities/counties that allow it instead of well planned and managed communities. Only when traffic becomes unbearable do they even think about the consequences of sprawl.
And it all ties back to fuel...development in area that requires commuting is no longer just going to be about congestion (which CA has dealt with for decades) it's now hitting people in their pocketbooks much faster than their paychecks have grown, and is part of the reason the housing market is so terrible. At least in my area, you see a LOT of new houses sitting vacant because no one wants to drive that far anymore.
That's what allows sprawl to happen...greedy cities/counties that allow it instead of well planned and managed communities. Only when traffic becomes unbearable do they even think about the consequences of sprawl.
And it all ties back to fuel...development in area that requires commuting is no longer just going to be about congestion (which CA has dealt with for decades) it's now hitting people in their pocketbooks much faster than their paychecks have grown, and is part of the reason the housing market is so terrible. At least in my area, you see a LOT of new houses sitting vacant because no one wants to drive that far anymore.

From the outside in another car, a diesel can be heard, but it's not anywhere near annoying, and if you're not paying attention, you won't notice. And the power, it makes any gasser of the same displacement feel like crap.
.

)
