CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

How can this be right???

bigwalleye

Registered Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Posts
38
Reaction score
0
Location
Portland
I thought a Blazer is bigger than this. Is this just a miss print?

Year:: 1972 Production Total: 44,266
Base Price: 3,145 Weight: 3,677
Wheel Base: 104 in. Fuel Tank Capacity: 23.5-gallon
Length: 177.5 in. Height: 68.7 in.

This can from the SPEC page on this sight.
 
for a 72 i think "base weight" means:
no top
no passenger seat
no rear seat

so thats ~350 lbs right there
but yeah, that does seem low
 
seems like the wheel base is longer. If I remeber right a 72 blazer seems massive compared to my wagoneer.
 
no, the 104" is right for first gens
they stretched it to 109" for second gens
 
I guess a 72 with 4" running 36 tsl is just look bigger rig. I am going to bitch the wagoneer and pick up this 72 next month. It also has a 396. Looking forward to wheeling a bigger truck . I started off with a TJ, than digressed to wagoneer. Hopefully this K5 will be inspiring.
 
whoops.... thats right
109 is in reference to an engineering project i was working on.... too many numbers in my head
thanks for correcting me
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom