CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

Just Out of Curiousity

Well I have the really, really rare Chevy Jimmy. Or was that GMC Blazer?

All I know is I found my truck on the Autotrader site (Canada) by accidentally choosing one or the other using the drop down menus.

The guy didn't realize what he had done and couldn't understand why he hadn't received any calls but mine! :haha:
 
Chevy web site:

http://www.chevrolet.com/byo/build.cv?year=2007&make=Chevrolet&makeId=001&model=Silverado&modelId=109


GMC web site:

http://www.gmc.com/byo/build.gc?make=gc&makeId=012&brand=sierra900&originatingBrand=sierra900

I did a little pricing and I ended up with a $35,540 GMC and a $35,890 Chevy. Both were top of the line, classic, 2wd, crew cab, short beds. Exact color and options. Personaly I like Chevy but to me it doesn't really matter what brand you have as long as its made by GM you are still apart of the family. I would have understood someone saying something to you if you tried to join a Blazer group and you had a Bronco or a Ram Charger but come on you have the exact same thing just different badging.
 
Generally speaking, I prefer the GMC grills. They just look cooler.
I have a GMC sub, but when I go to the parts store, I always seem to find myself asking for parts for a chevy sub. I havent found any that didnt fit.....yet.
 
That guy is from the "it's not a lie if you believe it" mold.
 
I just threw out an old car club newspaper last week that mentioned something about this.

For the life of me I can't be sure, but I thought it mentioned that one or the other (GMC?) was originally the military branch of the company?

Anyone ever heard this? I suppose it might have related to the Canadian market though...
 
never thought of that. but if that were true would they all have the same badges? i'm kinda curious about that now. i knew there's a reason i never throw stuff away. it always comes back to haunt you
 
Randy92782 said:
i knew there's a reason i never throw stuff away. it always comes back to haunt you

Sooo bloody true. I looked at that darned paper long and hard before throwing it away, and thought, ahh I don't need anything in it. If only I had a half decent memory! :D
 
fireplug said:
Sooo bloody true. I looked at that darned paper long and hard before throwing it away, and thought, ahh I don't need anything in it. If only I had a half decent memory! :D
i know all about memory. i was gonna watch this show about early alzheimers....but forgot. hahahaha
 
02turbogixxer said:
I did a little pricing and I ended up with a $35,540 GMC and a $35,890 Chevy. Both were top of the line, classic, 2wd, crew cab, short beds. Exact color and options. Personaly I like Chevy but to me it doesn't really matter what brand you have as long as its made by GM you are still apart of the family. I would have understood someone saying something to you if you tried to join a Blazer group and you had a Bronco or a Ram Charger but come on you have the exact same thing just different badging.
One other thing I noticed when I was shopping my truck; in March GM had a sale. Side by side GMC/Chevy same model truck, GMC $2000 allowance, Chevy $3250 allowance. I bought Chevy.:D
 
I always heard that GMC was supposedly "superior" to Chevy, but I always consider them one in the same.

Plus I've always wanted a Chevy, because you never see "GMC" hats, shirts, etc...
 
fireplug said:
I just threw out an old car club newspaper last week that mentioned something about this.

For the life of me I can't be sure, but I thought it mentioned that one or the other (GMC?) was originally the military branch of the company?

Anyone ever heard this? I suppose it might have related to the Canadian market though...

I've seen really old GMC deuces for sale, so maybe they were the military branch?:confused:
 
i know in the 60s gmc had leaf spring rear suspensions and chevy had a trailing arm style on the 2 wheel drive trucks and i think gmc stayed with the torsion bar front suspension longer than chevy they changed to coils in 63

and gmc ran that boat ancor 305 v6

and the dashes were different from each other

and of corse the grills were different

there was alot of difference in chevy and gmc in the 60s
 
There are a ton of 40's GMC former military trucks south of me, so I would say it's safe to say they were the military branch. I know a guy with 4 of them, all 100% original inline 6 motors, still start right up and run like hell.
 
Some of you are very close to hitting the nail on the head. In the 80's and 90's I was a member of the National Chevy/GMC Truck Association based out of Apopka, Florida, and also the Napco Owners Group (a club for early GM 4x4's). These clubs put out newsletters and a monthly magazine called Pickups and Panels in Print. These publications went into detail about the history of Chevy's and GMC's. Yes indeed, the GMC was the producer of military 6x6's in WW1 and WWII. You will not see an old military 6x6 (or 4x4) that was a Chevy, they were all GMC's. In the late 40's and 50's Chevy's and GMC's were quite different. Most Chevy's during this era were considered lighter duty than thier fellow GMC's. The GMC frames were heavier (stiffer), and the GMC's used Pontiac engines because they usually put out more horsepower than the Chevy's at that time. Also, more of the GMC's had V8's under the hood, where Chevy's usually ran anemic stovebolt 6 cylinders. They were very reliable, but you wouldn't be getting anywhere very fast. This had as much to do with the low gearing in the diffs and the granny low 4speed trannys as it did with the slow revving stovebolt engines. That changed in 1957 when Chevy began using the 265ci V8 in trucks and a couple years later punched it out to 283ci. They also started using some automatic tranny's in trucks at this time (interestingly it was mostly in the GMC's with the big V8's and also the Chevy Cameo which was the predecessor to the El Camino).Over time the differences got smaller and less obvious. From the 1920's to the present they have always had different grills to help distinguish them, but now many of the components are similar. I think it was about the early or mid 1960's when many of the differences started to disappear completely. By the time the first K5 BLazer rolled off the line most of the differences were only cosmetic. Now, I hear that sometimes you can order something on your GMC that you can't get as an option on a Chevy and vice/versa. But you no longer see Pontiac engines in GMC's and I don't think the frames are any different now days.
If any of you are interested in old Chevy or GMC 4x4's visit the Napco Owners Group web site at www.napco4x4.org. It's very interesting and very educational.
By the way, I am still the proud owner of a 1956 Chevy Napco 4x4 that my father gave me when I was in high school. I've had numerous chances to sell it over the years, but I'm glad I didn't. I just need to quit playing with my K5 so much and finish the restoration of the '56.
 
Last edited:
gaspass said:
Some of you are very close to hitting the nail on the head. In the 80's and 90's I was a member of the National Chevy/GMC Truck Association based out of Apopka, Florida, and also the Napco Owners Group (a club for early GM 4x4's). These clubs put out newsletters and a monthly magazine called Pickups and Panels in Print. These publications went into detail about the history of Chevy's and GMC's. Yes indeed, the GMC was the producer of military 6x6's in WW1 and WWII. You will not see an old military 6x6 (or 4x4) that was a Chevy, they were all GMC's. In the late 40's and 50's Chevy's and GMC's were quite different. Most Chevy's during this era were considered lighter duty than thier fellow GMC's. The GMC frames were heavier (stiffer), and the GMC's used Pontiac engines because they usually put out more horsepower than the Chevy's at that time. Also, more of the GMC's had V8's under the hood, where Chevy's usually ran anemic stovebolt 6 cylinders. They were very reliable, but you wouldn't be getting anywhere very fast. This had as much to do with the low gearing in the diffs and the granny low 4speed trannys as it did with the slow revving stovebolt engines. That changed in 1957 when Chevy began using the 265ci V8 in trucks and a couple years later punched it out to 283ci. They also started using some automatic tranny's in trucks at this time (interestingly it was mostly in the GMC's with the big V8's and also the Chevy Cameo which was the predecessor to the El Camino).Over time the differences got smaller and less obvious. From the 1920's to the present they have always had different grills to help distinguish them, but now many of the components are similar. I think it was about the early or mid 1960's when many of the differences started to disappear completely. By the time the first K5 BLazer rolled off the line most of the differences were only cosmetic. Now, I hear that sometimes you can order something on your GMC that you can't get as an option on a Chevy and vice/versa. But you no longer see Pontiac engines in GMC's and I don't think the frames are any different now days.
If any of you are interested in old Chevy or GMC 4x4's visit the Napco Owners Group web site at www.napco4x4.org. It's very interesting and very educational.
By the way, I am still the proud owner of a 1956 Chevy Napco 4x4 that my father gave me when I was in high school. I've had numerous chances to sell it over the years, but I'm glad I didn't. I just need to quit playing with my K5 so much and finish the restoration of the '56.

very cool info, thanks
 
mrdrinksalil said:
A GMC Sierra Classic is the older body style. The new body style is just sierra


Yeah I know. I put the Classic in there because the Chevy Silverado is the same way. The older body style is the Silverado Classic and the new body style is just the Silverado. I just wanted to show that I looked up the price for the Classic body styles not the new body style.
 
Top Bottom