CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

K5 vs. Bronco

81K5GUY said:
I had a 95 Bronco with the 351w/aod-e combo.I liked it but it was full of rust when I bought it so I traded it for 86 Mustang back when I was doing the late model stang hing.
HA HA , lol . My cousin who has the Bronco I just worked on Just dropped off his 85 mustang lx convert w/88 gt 5.0 motor . I have to work on it and try to get it through deq . I'm not looking forward to it . wish me luck :rolleyes:
 
chopped&bobbed77burb said:
HA HA , lol . My cousin who has the Bronco I just worked on Just dropped off his 85 mustang lx convert w/88 gt 5.0 motor . I have to work on it and try to get it through deq . I'm not looking forward to it . wish me luck :rolleyes:

i`ll wish luck to you and anyone who owns a furd
 
79k20350 said:
have you ever seen the camber issues it has?:eek1:

Exactly my point. If you don't have the ride height exactly right, it's going to eat through tires like breakfast cereal.
 
My little bro has a badd arse 66 Bronco. I like them. The main reason for the K5 is $$$ everything is interchangable and cost less to build a sb Chevy than any other motor out there.
 
spoolnaround said:
My little bro has a badd arse 66 Bronco. I like them. The main reason for the K5 is $$$ everything is interchangable and cost less to build a sb Chevy than any other motor out there.

Chevy is always the as low as price

Like a good cheap hooker:D
 
Ford vs Chevy - the debate will never end. I love the early Broncos and Land Cruisers. The prices on the early Broncos are insane. I have a 97 F150XLT 4x4. I like the truck. It's a great daily driver. I replaced the engine two years ago at 74K. Cracked the number one cylinder. It looked like the head gasket let loose and pressure cracked it. There was no indication of a problem until the check engine light came on with an immediate engine miss. Too much f'n money for that Ford engine. The short block was $3K plus labor. The only reason I kept it, it was paid off. Hindsight, I would have built a new engine for the price I paid for the stock replacement.

I owned a 76 some 15 years ago and now a 79 K5. My father in law has a 90's model Bronco. The stealership has never been able to get the alignment right on his truck. Both Fords have been in the shop for recall work. His truck spent many trips to the stealership fixing "warranty" stuff.

I would highly recommend the Blazer. Parts are a dime a dozen. The full sized chevy parts from almost any Blazer, pickup and Suburban are pretty much interchangable for many model years. Take a look at Pirate's boards for Chevy and Ford as another reference. Most Ford talk is how to fix a problem, clear a trouble code and the likes and not improving capability or modifying it for serious use like the Chevy boards are. The Chevy users are building the trucks in their garages. Some trucks are pretty outragous.

Have you ever seen a serious Ford rig out on the trails. Their racing program is pretty good, but there is no real application for a rugged trail rig for the common builder.

Just my opinion.
 
i like bronco's until they went to the Twin I beam up front, after that they suck.


i had a 91 Ranger 4x4 that i put a 4" lift on, what a pain in the ass.

K5 is best fullsize made after 1980, id trade mine for a clean 1st gen bronco tho...


and powerwagons suck ass.
 
Having gone from a Bronco to a Blazer, and owning Fords now, here is my .02. I had a 90 Bronco with 7" of lift, a Sterling 10.25 swapped into the rear, Warn bumper with winch, and a few other goodies. I enjoyed it, it wheeled just fine, but I didn't like having all the electronics in the engine compartment. Since I go way out in the boonies, I wanted to get away from computer chips. The TTB worked very wheel for wheeling, except that you had to align it pretty much after every trip. The TTB really absorbs the bumps and when my buddy in his 86 SFA rig tried to drive as fast as me on washboard or bumpy roads, his teeth would rattle out of his head. The 5.7 I had ran well and never gave me any problems. So, why Blazer? Well, since I wheel out in the middle of nowhere it was more practical to drive a rig that had an abundance of parts readily available, was easy to fix, and had no fancy electronics to fail.

One of the pro's and con's of Fords is that they pretty much completely change everything it seems like every 2-3 years. Now, if you are a person who buys a new car as soon as it is paid off, then that is ok. If you want to find parts, it makes it problematic. But, I cannot stand the interiors of the newer Chevy's at all. They look cheap to me. And the exterior styling doesn't do much for me either. The pickups are blase and can't hold a candle to the new F-150 in the looks department. But, that is my opinion and everybody isn't going to have the same view.

Having completely broken down two Blazers to the frame and rebuilt them back up, I will say that they are pretty simple but there are some things that are poorly designed or cheap and some things that are brilliant as in any other rig. My initial plan was to get a 78 or 79 Bronco. They have the straight axle front, but on coils instead of springs which rides a bit smoother. I also love the look of those two years. The 78 and 79 were the first big Broncos before they went to TTB. Now, having sold my two 74 Blazers and being nearly done with my 76 would I do the same thing again? Hard to say. Knowing what I know now on the smog issue, and the decision not to do a full top off rig, I would probably have stayed with Ford. When I started my Blazer project I was going to do a 73-75 Blazer with a soft top and the smog laws in Ca. were a rolling 30 yr. exemption. Then they changed it so my 76 will need to be smogged forever. To be honest, if I knew these two things way back when, I probably would've stayed with the 78 Bronco. But, I'm already into my Blazer for major bucks and will stick with it. For new cars though, strictly Nissan and Ford. Other than the Vette, I wouldn't touch a new Chevy for anything.
 
79k20350 said:
it can be done right but it is not a good factory design. have you ever seen the camber issues it has?:eek1:

hell, our factory steering isnt the greatest either.

i love early broncos. but they are kind of small.
a well built bronco can be as good as a well built blazer. just depends where you spend the money blah blah blah

i think it depends on what you are going to build also, but mainly its a name thing. theres a lot of parts for both trucks. metal is metal. most things are created equal.

but all 3 in stock form..blazer is the best.:D

i dont know where i'm going with this...weeeeee
 
I like the stab at Ford's multiple bellhousing patterns... only 2(?) of which appear in a Bronco. ;)

How many trans/t-case patterns, adapters, and splines do we have to deal with on Chevs? :doah:

IMO the 78-79 Bronco has the K5 beat - or at least on par - with everything except the V8 gas engine.

Noteworthy mention... too bad Ford never did a diesel Bronco, and GM never did an EFI-L6 in the K5.
 
u2slow said:
I like the stab at Ford's multiple bellhousing patterns... only 2(?) of which appear in a Bronco. ;)

So we're only going to limit ourselves to engines that were available in our rigs? No Lx1 motors? :)

I don't care what they put in the Bronco only, I know I can take most any I/V/6/8 cylinder motor out of any GM vehicle from about 19xx(55?) -2000 and it will bolt up to my transmission, along with every single accessory ever run.
 
dyeager535 said:
So we're only going to limit ourselves to engines that were available in our rigs?

I was comparing stock vs. stock for the sake of argument.:o ... which inspired my comment on the gas V8.

GM trans/t-case incompatibility is a fresh sore point. Even when you establish the stars are in alignment, wind is blowing in the right direction, and the moon is full, somehow, somehow.... a TH350/203 is mistaken for a TH400/208 :rolleyes: :confused: :crazy: I give up.
 
dyeager535 said:
So we're only going to limit ourselves to engines that were available in our rigs?
I certainly hope not! The wheezy, smog-crap-choked, 160hp 305 that was in mine when it rolled out of Flint was a pathetic excuse for a small-block Chevy. Its replacement is what probably should have been under the hood as the absolute minimum base engine, and good riddance to its predecessor.
 
engine or tranny

I have owned both, while i did like my bronco, the engine went out, threw a bearing. My k5 has had brake problems and now the tranny needs a seal. I guess thats all just part of off roading.Bottom line is that the money and time one has to put into either truck will be the difference between a pleasant experience and a bad one. :waytogo:
 
Nuttin wrong with a fullsize Bronco, I'd run one. When I bought my K5 back in the mid 90s, I was looking for either/or. Didn't matter to me. Say what you want about the big broncos, but they had some good parts. The Ford np208 for example, was fix yoked and "clocked flat" from the factory. 460/C6 swaps are about as cheap as any big block v8 swap ever has been too.

TTB is a waste of time for hardcore offroad stuff, but then again so is a 10 bolt.

j
 
Chevy parts are cheap and easy to find and they are east to work on. On any car those things are a plus. I looked at dodge and ford before I bought my K5 and the chevy had everything that I wanted. Plus the Mouse can't be beat. You gotta love the Mouse. The 350 started the small block revolution. Everybody loves the smallblock V8. Toyota is a 5.4L in the Tundra. The Titan is a 5.6L I think. Even the new hemi is a smallblock.
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom