I have an NP 205 from a 72 K5 that is in my 78 K5. The frame supports do not reach the frame. I'm interested in how it reaches in the 72.
Last edited:

jims505 said:tc to frame 72Jimmy
diesel4me said:I have no pictures(sorry!)--but you might have the frame bracket fron a NP203 on your 78 frame--they are a bit shorter than the bracket for a NP205 t-case is..I think the big bolt holes are a bit different spacing too,but they are close enough that they might go in still..I sold a bracket I had for a NP205,and I thought I had another one,but it was off a NP203,and they were slightly different..
I ran a NP205 on my 74 K20 I had in place of its original NP203..I put the transfer case and frame bracket off a 71 GMC on it--I ran the bracket UNDER the frame rail instead of inside the channel,to gain clearance for dual exhaust..it never gave any trouble--I just used the OEM spacers and cushions--they take up about 3/4 of an inch space between the bracket and the frame--your using them right??--the bracket wont be long enough to reach the frame without them...![]()
Beast388 said:Here is how the NP205 attaches to the frame under my '71 Suburban. Your '72 should be the same.![]()
![]()
--the frame bracket setup is a much better way to support the T-case--those rods suck to install,and dont give as much support...but are better than nothing.. 
tarussell said:The frames got wider after 1977 on K5's at some point after the crossmember so the older side mount won't be a direct bolt on like it would a K-10 , K-20 .
Some say that the frame flex with a side mount could help kill a auto tranny if bound up enough and that would make a brace support rod better . It is my opinion that the side mount works best with a manual tranny and helps keep the drivetrain in place much better under torque loads. It really makes a difference driving a truck equiped with a manual tranny and a side mount compared to one that does not.
Tom
tarussell said:most of them are still available if you can't find a used one.
HTH's Tom
