Hey got a question for everyone. where am I going wrong I've run onto a bunch of road blocks like having most of my friends leave to go to Iraq to help with the fight. Those friends are the one who are normally willing to help when I hit a road block.
Any how the problem that I'm having is the clutch conversion that I'm currently working on. Is that I'm working with the clutch master cylinder, that slave cylinder , and supply line to and from both.
The problem is that I'm not getting any response from the slave clyinder I've breen trying to get all the air out of the line and it just doesn't seem to be working. And I was also wondering if at all is there a difference between the throw-out bearingsof the mechanicle pedal assembly and the hydraulic piston (slave cylinder). I was told that there was a difference from NOVAK-ADAPTERS the guy there said the difference is that the throw-out bearing for the hydro. assembly is thicker.
My good friend over seas said that if might be binding as well if there is any metal shardes in the fluid from the binding that it would cause premature failure in the diaphram in the master cylinder.
Sorry for being so long winded just really frustated.
Thankx for your time.
K5bodyboy
1985 GMC JIMMY w/ 355 putting out 425hp on the dyno. 3in. body lift and 4 in. suspension w/ 4:10's and soon 5:38's on 38.5 groung hawgs trucks ugly as hell but Im proud of it and it keeps me out of trouble , but always in trouble w/ my wife.
Any how the problem that I'm having is the clutch conversion that I'm currently working on. Is that I'm working with the clutch master cylinder, that slave cylinder , and supply line to and from both.
The problem is that I'm not getting any response from the slave clyinder I've breen trying to get all the air out of the line and it just doesn't seem to be working. And I was also wondering if at all is there a difference between the throw-out bearingsof the mechanicle pedal assembly and the hydraulic piston (slave cylinder). I was told that there was a difference from NOVAK-ADAPTERS the guy there said the difference is that the throw-out bearing for the hydro. assembly is thicker.
My good friend over seas said that if might be binding as well if there is any metal shardes in the fluid from the binding that it would cause premature failure in the diaphram in the master cylinder.
Sorry for being so long winded just really frustated.
Thankx for your time.
K5bodyboy
1985 GMC JIMMY w/ 355 putting out 425hp on the dyno. 3in. body lift and 4 in. suspension w/ 4:10's and soon 5:38's on 38.5 groung hawgs trucks ugly as hell but Im proud of it and it keeps me out of trouble , but always in trouble w/ my wife.
