originalspanksta
1/2 ton status
i believe so.
My opinion as to why there aren't more out there is because a.) it's not an easy swap for the novice, b.) it takes a lot of time for the novice, c.) you need to have the space to put it to build it, d.)it's not bolt-on simple, and e.) you can typically get a pre-'88 anything cheaper then a post-'88.
I love SAS'd post-'88s, but there aren't many out there. I still haven't put out the idea of going my '94 with a HPD60 one day. Instead of asking people "Why aren't there more out there", build your own, and get your fill of 'em in your own driveway
But I wasnt sure how many SASed GMT 400s excisting at all. Remember Im in Norway, and here the few numbers of Late Chevrolet/GMCs we have - only lick pavement. This thread totaly demonstrated it is a few numbers of them - too bad really. Maybe the number will increase in the future ?

TLCOR said:Hm. I just cant imagine its suppose to be any more expensive to SAS a Chevrolet - than it would be to SAS a Toyota Tacoma or similar Toyotajunk. Thoughts ?![]()
Competition is cool. Im pretty sure a *relatively* light and moderate GMT 400 would work OK with a 44, same as the Toyotas. Going leaves can be done really cheap with Chevroletparts on the Chevrolet. Beacuse Chevroletparts is exactly what the Toyotadummies put in there rigs.
The frontaxle on "PDaddys" rig looks like a D44 BTW..big94gmc said:***Off topic/hijack***
sweetk30, NO FLAT BED!!! Go with that normal bed you have! It looks sooooo much better!
***Off topic/hijack***
But in most a situations I agree, a nicely built bed with good quarterpanel protection looks way better than a flatbed. (And is often more practical, too)
Here is a local guys sweet truck. It has 14b and a dana 60, onboard welder and a whole bunch more of goodies. His brother has a 95 with a regular cab, shortbet, with a 44 front and 14 rear, daily driver.