
I don't get it? Whats the point?
less reciprocating mass than pushrod design, higher engine speeds increase power output for a given torque. The cam operates the valves directly or through a rocker arm, as opposed to overhead valve pushrod engines which have tappets, long pushrods, and rocker arms to transfer the movement of the lobes on the camshaft in the engine block to the valves in the cylinder head.
Says on site 7500 with stock valve springs
I am still a mechanic, I get the how it works part. I'm asking the why part. of changing a standard engine to ohc. How much does that kit cost........ I don't know, but WAY MORE than a it would cost to build a screaming "normal" SBC I bet.
My gravy is the Detroit Series60, OHC unit injector engine. I agree, its great. But paying a metric ****pile of money just to convert a standard pushrod engine over to it doesn't make sense to me.



less reciprocating mass than pushrod design, higher engine speeds increase power output for a given torque. The cam operates the valves directly or through a rocker arm, as opposed to overhead valve pushrod engines which have tappets, long pushrods, and rocker arms to transfer the movement of the lobes on the camshaft in the engine block to the valves in the cylinder head.
Says on site 7500 with stock valve springs

On the other side OHC heads are much bigger, heavier, higher COG etc. The Ford OHC V8's weigh more than an LS1 (Ford 4.6L vs Chevy 5.7L), plus the extra weight is all up top. Not to mention how much more compact a pushrod motor is.
There are lots of good things to say about an OHC motor but it isn't all rainbows![]()
Dont forget about the northstar motor in the caddys.
![]()



