[ QUOTE ]
If you have a boxed frame, and a cage tied into the frame at many places, you are better off. If you disagree, then you need to think harder... The cage not allowing it to flex? Have you not noticed the fact that our frames flex TOO MUCH. They are weaker than S-10 frames. The cage would add to the integrity of the frame.
[/ QUOTE ]
Exactly, but it will add uneven and too much integrity to certain areas and nowhere near enough to others, creating stress risers.
I don't care if I catch flak for this.
A cage tied into the frame with fatigue the frame for one, due to stress risers. It's also going to fatigue the cage, potentially to the point of failure when you need it most.
NHRA doesn't require cages tied to frames, neither do I. I will never believe in it, and I feel that it's a stupid idea to do such a thing.
Fine if you'll trust your life on a flex fatigued cage, but I won't.
Purpose built race rig or tube buggy where all the frame flex has been engineered out, that's fine. Until then....I'll keep my soon to be body mounted cage, thanks.