So i narrowed it down to 2 (maybe 3) shocks im looking at for the front of my blazer with 52" spring swap and 5" shackle in the rear. They are linked by desired order below and are all Bilstiens.
Ok here are some numbers:
It is 24" from lower shock mount to upper shock mount (static level).
If i get shock #1 that gives me about 3" upward travel and about 11" downward.
If i get shock #2 that gives me about 6" upward travel and about 6" downward
However after taking some measurements and play with my axle geometry i am leaning on shock #1 and this is why...
measurement from wheel center to wheel center is about 74". So with the assumption that the center of axle is the rotation angle that leaves a distance of 37" from center axle to wheel center. Lower shock mount measures 16-18" from wheel center (assume 16" to be safe). This means an upward travel of 3" at the shock mount location should net a little over 6" at the center of wheel as illustrated below.
The distance from my tire to fender is only 8" so i thought this should be perfect being that shock #2 would net a little over 12" and i would not be using all of its throw.
SHOCK #1 http://www.summitracing.com/parts/bsn-33-185576/overview/
SHOCK #2 http://www.summitracing.com/parts/bsn-33-185569/overview/
Is my logic correct is my question? what would you choose and why?
This brings me to my last question and shock #3. Is 255/70 valving good for a k5 blazer? Would shock number three be a better choice? it is right in between the two but has 360/80 valving.
SHOCK #3 http://www.summitracing.com/parts/bsn-f4b460350h1/overview/

Ok here are some numbers:
It is 24" from lower shock mount to upper shock mount (static level).
If i get shock #1 that gives me about 3" upward travel and about 11" downward.
If i get shock #2 that gives me about 6" upward travel and about 6" downward
However after taking some measurements and play with my axle geometry i am leaning on shock #1 and this is why...
measurement from wheel center to wheel center is about 74". So with the assumption that the center of axle is the rotation angle that leaves a distance of 37" from center axle to wheel center. Lower shock mount measures 16-18" from wheel center (assume 16" to be safe). This means an upward travel of 3" at the shock mount location should net a little over 6" at the center of wheel as illustrated below.
The distance from my tire to fender is only 8" so i thought this should be perfect being that shock #2 would net a little over 12" and i would not be using all of its throw.
SHOCK #1 http://www.summitracing.com/parts/bsn-33-185576/overview/
SHOCK #2 http://www.summitracing.com/parts/bsn-33-185569/overview/
Is my logic correct is my question? what would you choose and why?
This brings me to my last question and shock #3. Is 255/70 valving good for a k5 blazer? Would shock number three be a better choice? it is right in between the two but has 360/80 valving.
SHOCK #3 http://www.summitracing.com/parts/bsn-f4b460350h1/overview/
I might be working downtown there today too.