CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

SM 420 2wd and 4wd version?

tellmehow

Newbie
Joined
Jul 11, 2004
Posts
2
Reaction score
0
Location
Los Angeles, Ca
Hey guys! Anyone know if the SM420 off a 1966 2 wheel drive 3/4 ton truck will work for my 4x4 blazer? Some guy wants $100 for the trans with bellhousing & I'm not sure if this trans is what I need /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif Thanks
Frank
 
Advance Adapters
Novak
the bottom line is that it isnt worth it when a $50 sm465 bolts up
 
also the ball stud that the H Bar for the clutch linkage was placed on the engine blocks back then, where as a 465's is on the bellhousing.

id like to have a SM420 for its shift pattern, but the no sych 1 and 2 is a downfall.
 
[ QUOTE ]
also the ball stud that the H Bar for the clutch linkage was placed on the engine blocks back then, where as a 465's is on the bellhousing.

id like to have a SM420 for its shift pattern, but the no sych 1 and 2 is a downfall.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ballstud location is year specific. Split is 72/73.

SM420 is syncro 2nd... except when it's worn out. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif

EDIT: Only married t-case adapter is for the SM420 is a Rockwell T221. ('67 only)
 
hmmm, learn something new everyday.

so there are 465 bellhousings without a ball stud for the h-bar? is that an aluminum or cast iron bellhousing for those goofed up years?
 
68-72 use block-mount ballstud and cast bellhousing with correct index for SM465.
 
Top Bottom