Actually, turbulence isn't a bad thing at all. What is important is where it is, and isn't. Turbulence in the intake runners causes a thick boundary layer which effectively reduces the size of the runner. That's not so good. In a wet flow intake (TBI & Carb'd) you need some turbulence the whole length of the runner to keep all of the fuel suspended in the air. A polished port wall won't do this. When the fuel condenses out of the air and runs down the port floor as a liquid then power, drivability, and mileage all suffer.
Turbulence at the point where the fuel is intro'd to the air is a good thing. Most late model heads are designed to produce turbulence at the intake valve pocket to better promote a homogeneous mixture. The more homogeneous the mixture is, the more efficient the burn and therefore the power the engine will make from a given amount of fuel.
The whole point of Smokey's "Adiabatic Engine" (which it was NOT) was to better homogenize the fuel into the air. From what I've seen both at work and elsewhere, there is a huge amount of power going to waste due to lack of fuel/air charge homogenity. When the mixture approaches total homogenity it can actually ignite (detonate) at precisely the right time for best power and efficiency. The phenomenon is called "HCCI", Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition. It's similar to the diesel cycle, but a LOT harder to do consistantly.
I wouldn't buy a Tornado either.