cool idea, more u-joints to worry about. which setup is considered stronger? married or divorced?
muddybuddy said:cool idea, more u-joints to worry about. which setup is considered stronger? married or divorced?

muddybuddy said:cool idea, more u-joints to worry about. which setup is considered stronger? married or divorced?
divorced said:In stock form, I would say a divorced setup is stronger and more reliable. Although there are 2 more u-joints to worry about, there is no coupler (as used with a married 205) to worry about wearing out or breaking. The input and both output shafts are 32 spline on a Dodge divorced case. There is no front CV shaft.
A divorced case isn't practical for many people though because of the loss of ground clearance. It really depends on what your specific needs are. I don't do rocks, so the clearance issue wasn't a concern for me.
Pro's of a divorced case:
1. Good driveshaft angles when you have more than 6" of lift without using a high $$$ CV shaft (I hate CV shafts).
2. The front and rear shafts can be made identical so if you break the back one you can swap the front one in until you get a new shaft.
3. I can change to any 2wd transmission, automatic or manual, without spending $11 million for an output shaft change and varoius adapters and couplers. I could even put a Ford engine/transmission in and all I would have to do is get the intermediate shaft made ($100).
muddybuddy said:so could you technically run a divorced doubler? like have a married 203 to the tranny, then a short shaft to a divorced 205? i know the 203 front output might get in the way, but if you were using a divorced 205 then it wouldnt matter right? might be too redneck and ugly, but it would be a cheap way to get 4:1...could that work?
