I've decided that I'm going to make the switch to a hydro clutch.
Now I need to make the decision on which Nv4500 I have to use. I have both the newer and older style. My guy feeling is to use the older style that has the external slave cylinder...just for ease of future replacment. I haven't driven either one, but I trust the source that the older one came from. When I picked up the newer one the guy said 3rd was starting to feel notchy when shifting....come to find out it had regular gear oil ran in it. So that one will probably need syncros at the very minimum.
Does the newer one offer any advantages over the earlier one that I should use it instead? I know the shift towers are different, not real sure if that make much of a differance in shifting. Other than the 1st gear differances and the slave cylinders, aren't they basicly the same?

Edit: Yes I know the t-case behind the newer one is drivers side drop.
Now I need to make the decision on which Nv4500 I have to use. I have both the newer and older style. My guy feeling is to use the older style that has the external slave cylinder...just for ease of future replacment. I haven't driven either one, but I trust the source that the older one came from. When I picked up the newer one the guy said 3rd was starting to feel notchy when shifting....come to find out it had regular gear oil ran in it. So that one will probably need syncros at the very minimum.
Does the newer one offer any advantages over the earlier one that I should use it instead? I know the shift towers are different, not real sure if that make much of a differance in shifting. Other than the 1st gear differances and the slave cylinders, aren't they basicly the same?

Edit: Yes I know the t-case behind the newer one is drivers side drop.
