CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.
Can't you just angle the shock and valve it right? I wouldn't think leafs necessitate anything that complicated.
 
Can't you just angle the shock and valve it right? I wouldn't think leafs necessitate anyhting that complicated.
No.. digressive is digressive, which means the shock is slowing down and really kills the effectiveness of its job at the point it matters the most, bump, you want the truck to prevent that the last few inches. It matters less with a position shock like a bypass. Because it can create its own progressive curve.
The other reason is to use a short shock with long travel. I used a 12 inch shock with a travel of 16 inches without changing the motion ratio curve.
When you angle a shock it does lots of funny things.
 
Can't you just angle the shock and valve it right? I wouldn't think leafs necessitate anything that complicated.
Btw the valving is velocity dependent, so if the shock shaft velocity changes in the mid stroke the effective valving and its impact will also, which is why so much attention should be paid to reducing the changes the shock is seeing so the tune is more predictable and like you said can be valved properly.
 
I don't know how much lift @Babaganoosh has but with 5" of lift on mine I can fit Bilstein 7100 short body reservoir shock with 14" travel or 12" standard body straight up. IIRC both have the same collapsed length.

I've been running shocks angled forward and I don't like the rear suspension behavior. I think it may be the angle. Here in the near future I'll be mounting the 12" travel standard body 7100 shocks vertical in the rear. Interested to see the difference.
 
I don't know how much lift @Babaganoosh has but with 5" of lift on mine I can fit Bilstein 7100 short body reservoir shock with 14" travel or 12" standard body straight up. IIRC both have the same collapsed length.

I've been running shocks angled forward and I don't like the rear suspension behavior. I think it may be the angle. Here in the near future I'll be mounting the 12" travel standard body 7100 shocks vertical in the rear. Interested to see the difference.
I'm really not sure where im at, I think around a 4 inch lift. The coil over is set at a 48/53 split. It barely fits under my garage door by about a inch or so.
 
I don't know how much lift @Babaganoosh has but with 5" of lift on mine I can fit Bilstein 7100 short body reservoir shock with 14" travel or 12" standard body straight up. IIRC both have the same collapsed length.

I've been running shocks angled forward and I don't like the rear suspension behavior. I think it may be the angle. Here in the near future I'll be mounting the 12" travel standard body 7100 shocks vertical in the rear. Interested to see the difference.
With our trucks the springs travel rearward anyway unless you are compressing them past flat.. so rear angled shocks makes sense.
 
Is there any reason you can't run a shock straight up through the wheel well with a shock hoop? And then maybe a removable brace side to side. That wouldn't limit the use of your bed very much at all
 
With our trucks the springs travel rearward anyway unless you are compressing them past flat.. so rear angled shocks makes sense.
I did front angle because I was thinking of axle wrap. Thinking about what you're saying then I'm thinking even more that I need to change them.
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom