CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

305 vs 350, manual vs auto

inscape

Registered Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Posts
82
Reaction score
0
Location
Washington
Would a 305 in a 81 Jimmy be a lot less powerful than a 350? Also, are the manuals more reliable than the autos? I'm going to go look at an 81 Jimmy tomorrow that has a 305 and stick. I like my stick in my Civic, it's fun, but i've only test drove a K5 with a bad clutch and it wasn't fun at all. I'll see how this one is tomorrow.
 
305 is wimpy compared to a 350 , stock for stock . However bodywork costs more than a motor . If the truck is clean , well cared for , and works buy it anyway .

You can always swap the motor out later ( what I said over 4 years ago , damn thing is in truck still LOL ) .
 
Shifting gears in a civic is differnet than shifting gears in my Blazer...My Blazer is like shifting a truck, you don't just go from gear to gear lickety split...with that said, having a manual rocks and I wouldn't go back, even if I could
 
The SM465 is probably one of the strongest and most reliable transmissions ever put in a light duty truck. I would expect it to last at least twice as long as an auto in the same truck.
 
A 305 in good condition is fine for wheeling, especially if you have a manual transmission. Unless you are going to use it for towing I would say go for it.
 
i had a 305 i my truck for a few years, it got the job done but i had to lose it for a 350, i had an auto too and put a 465 in, i think swapping engines was easier then trannys so i say go for it
 
Well the Jimmy I looked at was pretty crappy. Wasn;t in great shape and then when I looked by the steering box to check for cracks the frame was bent. So now tomorrow i'll be looking at a 1st gen with a crate 350/auto for $1,500
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom