it seems to me if I go to a lesser shackle length and go to the middle holes it'll make my shackle angle more severe and decrease the amount of lift.
This is the way I see shackle angle and spring length. Longer shackles will enable you to run a longer spring. Example: running the 52s (51 3/8in)gave me a shackle angle of roughly 0*. I wanted to run a longer spring that came out to be approx 55in eye to eye. So my new springs were gonna be approx 3.5in longer. SO the way i see it is if I was running the stock 4.5 shackles most of that length would be ate up in relocating the spring rearward. By that I mean, the shackle is going to be 3.5in back on the vertical plane and only 1in down on the horizontal plane, giving me a very severe shackle angle of approx. 78* by my calculations.
So let's go to my situation with a 7.25 shackle with a spring that's 3.5in longer. It'll be pushed back 3.5in and 3.75in of shackle play left until the shackle is completely flat and parallel to the ground. Ya following me?
SO my hypothesis seems to be fairly correct in this as my current shackle angle is roughly 53*. But also under my same hypothesis one should be able to run a 64in long rear spring with a 28in long shackle

. Now that is completely ridiculous and totally impractical but it stands to reason that for every inch of spring length you add you need to add twice that to maintain the same shackle angle.
SO, since I wanted a approx 45* shackle angle and not want to relocate my shackle brackets, I would need to run a 8in shackle (4.5 + 3.5 = 8) to get that 45* angle. (If I wanted to maintain the 0* shackle angle, in theory I would have needed to run a shackle that was 7in longer than stock).
So running a 7.25in shackle instead of a 8in will give me a steeper shackle angle. That's also why I'm gonna put in a add-a-leaf to hopefully decrease the spring length under the weight of the truck. So instead of it sitting flat and being 55in eye to eye. It'll be less, let's guessimate and say 54 3/8in from eye to eye, which will result in less shackle angle
Don't know if my reasoning is correct. But it makes sense in my mind and if I had pictures I think I could make it more clear. Please chime in if you think I'm way off

or if you have more insight