CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

84 k10 454 tbi swap

blazin_blazer

1/2 ton status
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Posts
4,040
Reaction score
1
Location
central arkansas
i just bought a 87 2wd 3/4 ton for its tbi 454, the motor is going in a 84 model k10...should i just go w/ a carb/q-jet and keep it simple or swap the tbi over to the 84 since i have the complete 87 cc? i'm running a 465/205 also, so i'm thinking an aluminum carb intake and carb will be the easiest swap to do since i need no kind of trans control & won't need a return line w/ the carb or is it pretty straight forward to swap the tbi over when you have the whole truck it comes out of? also does an 87 tbi 454 have a roller cam?
 
i searched several different phrases-454 tbi, 454 tbi swap, tbi swap,& several others and learned quite alot, but everything i read, was for 454tbi into a truck that already had a 350 tbi in the rig, and most were using the stock 350 tbi harness and changing injectors, ecm/or reburning the ee-prom chip, and changing a few connectors in the harness, so it will work.

i'm working w/a 87 donor, w/the 454 tbi engine, thats going into an 84 k-10 that was carb'd, and I'm running a sm465/np205, so i need the ecm to control just the engine & I'd like to junk everything else i don't need(get rid of all the smog junk i can), we have no test here, not even an inspection. so i need someone who has done this same swap to chime in to let me know what i need to use/to pull from donor truck and what i can ditch...and tell me where to find the wires i need or link me to some good threads or innerweb pages.

it maybe easier to leave the k10 truck like it is & get a closed loop ecm & harness from painless wiring, iirc, i think the whole kit/engine harness and ecm are under $400, i haven't looked recently. but, why spend that money when i have everything to do it with, already on the donor truck, it runs & drives! i could even drop the c-10 cc tanks & get the fuel pump out of it and put it in my 84 tank.(will it swap over by just pulling the whole thing out, lid & all and putting it in the 84 tank? are the openings the same size? are they standardized where this would work and i just have to untwist the ring that locks it down & put it in the 84 tank and twist to lock it closed & hook up the lines and swap in the return line from the CC and cut it to k10 length?

i think i remember reading about someone here, on ck5 that will rework the original harness and cut away "all the fat", so you wind up w/ only the wires you need. anyone know who this member is? i need to talk w/him, with a little help i can do this, i was a radar & tacan tech in USMC, so basic wireing is well within my grasp and i can do this with a little guidance of what wire does what. i suppose i could work it out w/the schematics, but it would be so much easier if i could talk to someone who has done this same swap already! if anyone has pretty good info on putting a tbi into a non-tbi 4x4 in their build thread please give me a link to your thread!

not thinking about the ease of being able to just leave the k10 like it is and install an aftermarket ecm that deals with the engine only & comes w/instructions! how hard is it to swap the stock wiring harness? i'm not sure an aftermarket ecm & harness would allow everything to function correctly inside, like all the controls on the turn signal/cruise,wipers, etc, etc. while being easier, it maynot do everything i want it to do. i know the stock harness connects through the bulkhead on the drivers side into the fuse block, this is the reason i wonder if i would have to change the wiring under the dash also, and have been told that the harness also runs thru the firewall on the pasenger side to the ecm, at least thats what i have been led to believe.

i do believe the 87 c-20 has a th-400 behind the 454tbi, and iirc, the ecm doesn't mess w/ a th400 trans anyway, so the 87 ecm may already just control the engine....:dunno:

i want everything inside the truck to work, like the gauges, lights, wiper switches & cruise control thats on the turn signal, and the dual gas tank rocker switch,etc,etc,i want it all to work. i am curious, will i have to put the under dash harness out of the 87 into the 84 cab also, so that the harness will plug in under the hood. again iirc, i will need the harness that goes thru the firewall on the right side that goes to ecm. what else do i have to keep and what can go? surely someone has a build thread or tech thread w/ this same kind of swap in it, i'd be forever grateful if someone would show me some more links to this info, i think we need a tbi sticky thread. ooo, wait we have a fuel injection forum don't we, i've never been in it. i will have to check it out.

this is my 1st attempt at swapping tbi onto anything, my 1st time converting to tbi ever, i've always used carb's...this is also my 1st BBC, well i have 1 more 454 but it needs a rebuild and its getting the crank and rods out of a 366T BBC b/c they come from the factory w/ steel nitrated-hardend crank and rods & it turns a 454 into a 427 and that is my favorite BBC, so, i may have questions coming up as i start & progress thru my build, i'm fairly well mechanically inclined so hopefolly not alot of questions! i will start a build thread here shortly b/c i've collected enuff parts to almost finish the build, if it would quit raining!

idk why, but, i have always dreamed of having a 427. i remember seeing a camaro when i was 12 or 14, with a 427 just smoking everything that pulled up beside it and it sounded so GOOD, i've been hooked ever since. they seem to wrap up faster than a 454 b/c of thier shorter stroke! so, i bought this running 87 c-20 srw cc w/tbi 454 to get everything in the k-10 truck wired for the tbi and to have a complete donor for parts to swap in, but i feel intimidated by the swap & i want to drive the k10 w/stock tbi 454, as i save $$$ to build my dream 427 BBC, when i have the other motor ready, then i'll pull the 454 and change engines. then i want to find another 366T to rob it of its crank and rods and build a spare engine to keep in my shop, on a floor mounted engine stand w/ gauges and radiator, so i can start it every now and then to keep it up and running, just to hear it run and disturb the neighbors when i need to be loud! but thats a long way off right now! =)

SORRY ABOUT THE NOVEL!
 
MAN, i didn't realize i typed so much, i knew it was long, but not that long, thanks who all endure it & double thanks to people who post relevant info....
 
first off, let me say that i have no experience with anything TBI related.

however, i would say that if you want everything to function (engine and interior stuff) i would try to swap in as much of the harness that matches the engine as you can, as for what you will have to change and what you won't, i would compare the wiring diagrams on http://brochures.slosh.com/wiring/ and see, plus looking at connectors to see if they are the same in shape and organization of wires.

IMHO, i would say drop an aluminum intake and a 4bbl on there and call it good since you don't have to worry about any ECM control of drivetrain(4spd and 205), and you already know your way around a carbed setup. The only reasons not to are either 1)cost or 2)maintaining fuel pressure at more extreme angles, or personal preference.

not a whole lot of hard facts, but it gives you a bump and lets you know we ain't hangin you out to dry:D
 
that's kinda the way I'm leaning, is using a carb for now, the donor will stay here if i ever feel froggy & jump on swapping in the tbi setup after I've learned more about it!
 
I wouldn't even consider a carburetor if you have a complete TBI setup. A 1987 doesn't know anything about the tranny behind it. In my 1988 V10 Suburban, I swapped out the TH700R4 for an SM465, and it doesn't change anything. You should be able to do this swap very simply. I have a 1982 K30 with a 454, and I want to swap it to TBI. It doesn't make the most power, but it makes up for it in driveability, start up, and not stalling out on angles. I took my K30 out today rock climbing, and I hate that carb.

Martin
 
Easier in the long run to just take everything from the donor, and bolt it in.

My dad just got a 454 setup out of a Suburban, but has a K20. Getting lines, tanks, and senders is a hassle. You are one up on him there.

FWIW, the PROM is different between an auto and manual. Load on the engine is different obviously, and that is made up for in the PROM. You may or may not notice the difference, but if you never had it "right", you'll never know what right is. :)
 
My 350 TBI runs much better now that I have an SM465 instead of the TH700R4, with the same OEM PROM.

Martin
 
My 350 TBI runs much better now that I have an SM465 instead of the TH700R4, with the same OEM PROM.

Martin

What is better about it? Is it engine related or just now that you have a clutch it's better. As Dorian has stated, there is ton of information in the chip. Making changes to your setup without a change to the information contained in the chip and then using seat of the pants tuning may not yield the best results.
 
I think one of the main "betters" is the fact that he doesn't have to turn 5k in low low to get home. The second fact none of you know is its far from a stock 350 so it will get a chip once the vortecs and lt1 cam I gave him are in. Dyno tuned in fact.
 
It can't run better with the OEM auto trans prom than if it were calibrated for the manual trans.

A torque converter takes more power to turn in gear than a manual does with the clutch depressed. Accelerating from a stop, you have no slip from a clutch (once it's out), while a converter is ALWAYS slipping under load until the TCC locks up. Different loads require different timing and fueling, and any comparison between an auto and manual PROM will show that both are indeed different, sometimes quite significantly. Knock sensors can also hide some problems.
 
I thnk your missing the point. The 700r4 when to see jesus so he swapped in a 465/208. It runs better cause it moves. It may not be better that if it was tuned in but it sure as hell is better than not moving.
 
I thnk your missing the point. The 700r4 when to see jesus so he swapped in a 465/208. It runs better cause it moves. It may not be better that if it was tuned in but it sure as hell is better than not moving.

Simmer down. No ones busting his or your balls on this. Sorry I posted.
 
I am calm, it was just funny we were talking about totally different things.
 
I am calm, it was just funny we were talking about totally different things.

Whatever makes you feel better about yourself. :rolleyes:


I've talk with Dorain on few issues concerning chips, he knows what he's talking about and just wanted to help a brother out. I don't have the knowledge that he has but I know there's issues. No one wanted to do anything but help and you seem to be on the defensive mode from the word go.
 
I don't believe he was on the defensive, he was trying to explain the situation. The engine has an OEM TBI PROM. It use to have a TH700R4. It now has an SM465. The transmission being the only difference. It runs much better. It gets better mileage (without overdrive), and it doesn't struggle with the cam.

Most of the problem is that it is not a stock 350 TBI engine. It is a block out of a TPI IROC with a set of Speed Pro forged flat tops, a GMPP LT4 Hot Cam, a set of lightly ported swirl port heads off of a '93 TBI 350 from a pickup with different valves and springs. The cat is gone, the A.I.R. system is gone, it has headers with 2 1/2" true dual exhaust. It is kind of cobbled together, but I built the entire thing for about $400.

I don't like the heads that are on it, and the LT4 cam is a bit much for it's intended use, so I bought a set of Vortec heads and a GMPP TBI Vortec intake, and John gave me a stock LT1 camshaft out of a Camaro. I need to get those on it, and then a dyno tuned PROM would probably be a good idea.

Either way, it runs better now, with the SM465 in place of the TH700R4.

Martin
 
so swap everything into the 84, including the y-pipe w/02 sensor and have my ecm flashed for motor only, 87 3+3 has a th400 doesnt it? if so, wouldn't the ecm be controlling just the motor already?
 
I don't like the heads that are on it, and the LT4 cam is a bit much for it's intended use, so I bought a set of Vortec heads and a GMPP TBI Vortec intake, and John gave me a stock LT1 camshaft out of a Camaro. I need to get those on it, and then a dyno tuned PROM would probably be a good idea.

Either way, it runs better now, with the SM465 in place of the TH700R4.

Martin

What is the casting number on the Vortec heads you got? Are they new? There were two casting numbers, one set is good 12558060 or 12558062 (I've not seen the 12558062s but read about them this number may also be a bare head) and one that has a hardened exhaust seat that makes poo poo TQ and HP. Here is a link to an extremely good write up on Vortex heads.

http://www.customclassictrucks.com/...c_cylinder_heads_small_block_chevy/index.html

be forewarned that some ¾- and 1-ton trucks came with Vortec heads equipped with a specially hardened exhaust seat that kills low- and mid-lift flow. Casting number 10239906 should be avoided.
 
No, they are not new. They are used, and they are 906's. I am aware of them being the less desireable head, but I know lots of guys using them that are pleased with them. I am not building a drag car, they will still be head and shoulders above a swirl port head.

John, I should let you throw these on your flow bench, or have you tried a set of 906's already?

Martin
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom