CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

94 Z28 coupe

I'm too lazy to go back and look. Are you pulling and burning prom chips or does this have direct.
Obd1, but the very first year that a GM computer could be entered and reprogrammed via ALDL cable

Tuning software is TunerPro
Dataloging and analytics are through EEHack, freeware actually
Flashhack transfers all of the data into the program sides

Both of those last 2 were written by the same programmer.

All 3 are free
 
Don’t get me wrong… a 5.0 mustang with minimal mods could do that in 1988 with a manual trans.
Even with me running it.

We were at see level though, in British Columbia.

Of course the one car I’m talking about did eventually get wrapped around a telephone pole…Lol!

I wasn’t there… I’ve done my share of stupid shit, but not that day.

Just a non relevant story I was thinking about.

Or if you like.

PAD! :haha:
I distinctly recall the Fox bodys ran real close stock to these at this altitude
The 4.6 mod motor cars of the same age were about a second slower

Our altitude is brutal. Just going to sea level, the slowest of those slips would be 13.9 at 100 something
The fastest would be 13.3 at 107 or so
 
Altitude is a bitch. Keep at it Mark, you're getting there. Tuning at the strip will be nice if you can get the car real consistent. Gains can be seen with actual time or mph data, instead of the 'I think it feels faster' :rotfl:
 
Altitude is a bitch. Keep at it Mark, you're getting there. Tuning at the strip will be nice if you can get the car real consistent. Gains can be seen with actual time or mph data, instead of the 'I think it feels faster' :rotfl:
But dyno is accurate!

Butt dyno is not!
 
Top Bottom