Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.
I will be swapping in a SM465 into my blazer, so i have never driven a 465 before, why is it that everyone wants the hydro clutch? what are the advantages?
hydro is easier on the leg and it doesnt tie to the frame, so if you get all twisted, it still works, mechanical can have issues
mech transmits better "pedal feel" so you can feel when and how the clutch is engaging
Advantages: Easier pedal effort, eliminate frame flex problems (these are mostly caused by 30 year old rubber body mounts, replacing them with poly mounts pretty much eliminated this problem)
Disadvantages: Cost of swapping (assuming you have to swap), more complex, slave/master cylinder has the potential of failing and leaving you stranded (this doesn't seem to be a huge deal with the Chevy stuff, but tons of J**p slaves/clutch master cylinders fail all the time). IMO, stick with the manual clutch if you are ok with working a real clutch
I went with the hydraulic clutch on my custom install for two reasons. First was as stated above, here in Utah we play in the rocks alot and I have seen to many mechanical clutches fail when the truck got all bound up. Second was the install. By the time I got everything tucked up as tight as I wanted, it would have been a real nightmare to get mechanical linkage working. I went with all factory GM stuff from a wrecked 85 3/4 ton with no problems at all. Just my 2 cents worth.