CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

Another shell hoist design - With pics

Lunatic

1/2 ton status
Joined
Jul 27, 2008
Posts
439
Reaction score
4
Location
Ft Hood, Texas
Yep - Another hoist thread. This one is a different animal though.

Firstly, I'd like to thank Craig Artzner for his posting of his hoist install years ago. I was actually looking into pulley reduction math to do the same project when I found his thread. It was cake from there.

For many reasons, however (Mainly the attic time spent), I waited 2 years later to finally do the project. The trigger for my decision was dumping my shell last year while putting it back on. That was the straw.

Any hoist install is going to be different per the installer and the location's space and structure. I didnt like the idea of applying what I felt was 1000 lbs (ever drop your shell and try to catch it ?) to my attic joists, or my wall studs. So I thought everything over, according to Craig's installations (both of them) and made a few changes. What follows is what I will admit is over kill - But better over done than not enough, and have a ceiling collapse.

I think my install adds a cool new twist. So, I thought I'd share the tweaked install with everyone.



DSC_000150.jpg


Close quarters......



 
DSC_000450.jpg




DSC_000650.jpg




DSC_000950.jpg


I rocked my truck back and forth before deciding this loop would hold the shell. Its simply a 5/8 steel sleeve that I crushed once I liked the loop dimensions.




DSC_001550.jpg



DSC_001750.jpg


The change in design....




DSC_001850.jpg


Safety.

The front of the shell, being at the rear of the pulley system, is last to rise while raising. You constantly need to adjust the shell to level while raising it off the truck. But, once you are leveled off and free, it can easily "run away" if bumped or adjusted carelessly - Sending the shell rear to the ground and front to the ceiling. I placed a zip tie to each pulley at the front of the shell to prevent pulley roll. The zip tie is very effective being so close to the pulley - I could no longer adjust the shell's level from front to rear.




DSC_002050.jpg



DSC_002150.jpg


A "per installation / location" option - My ceiling is too low to leave it hanging. Even though my car will fit under it.




DSC_002250.jpg


Swiveling casters at the front and fixed casters at the rear. I installed them using wingnuts for easier / quicker install to the 2x6.




DSC_002350.jpg


These bolts were counter sunk (drilled) on the head side so the bolt head doesnt contact the truck bed. The nuts were counter sunk as well. This created the "stud" you see above - Which I found out was a good idea to have fastened. With the constant angle and adjustment of the shell while lifting it off the truck, the shell will slide any given direction. This shell is secured, leaving me to watch other points of interest which needed monitoring. A wingnut once again does the job.




DSC_002450.jpg


The attic. The shortest vertical brace to the longest - 14.5", 23", 35". Theres one installed near each eyebolt. Finding a way to make leverage for a 3" screw at the shortest brace was.... Interesting. I spent 2 evenings in the attic - About 6 + 6 hours each night.




DSC_002550.jpg


Right above the sheetrock is a cut 2x4 crossing joist to joist - I installed each (6 total) about 1/4" above the surface. These boards prevent the eyebolts from swinging through the sheetrock and creating a larger hole down below.

The top 2x4 crosses numerous joists from eyebolt to eyebolt, and is secured to each joist it contacts. An additional nut (not seen) is installed on each eyebolt, under the 2x4 and snug fitted. The eyebolts can be rotated with minimal effort if necessary from the garage floor. Not only does this 2x4 serve as the mounting surface for the eyebolts, but it also provides a second point of contact which keeps the eyebolts completely steady and solid.




DSC_002650.jpg


Off to the side until the cold returns.




DSC_002750.jpg


Now that this project is done - Its time to start the season of the lawn.




DSC_002850.jpg


The winch, rope, pulleys - everything - Put away. The casters have their own identical bag. A two bag foot print when the shell is installed on the truck is defintely manageable.




DSC_002950.jpg

 
A type of carriage bolt is used to cover the holes and anchors. It has a flat top instead of coned.



 

 
 
Questions / comments welcome.
 
 




Troy B
Ft Hood, TX
 
Last edited:
pretty darn snazy if you ask me
nice, and I know nice since I just removed my shell the other day with a friend. Damn thing is heavy.
 
that is a nice setup!

I take my top off by myself though. Its a good workout, but its quick and easy
 
I had the luxury of owning a genuine REESE truck cap hoist when I had my K5's...bought it from a dealer that was going out of buissiness back in the late 80's for 100 bucks..it was made of 3" square tubing,was wide enough to straddle the full sized truck bed and had 6" pneumatic tires ,and a hand crank winch to do the lifting,along with a load spreader where it touched the roof you'd attach the straps too...it had two tires in the rear close together on a fork so they can be steered ,had a handle bar you pulled it with...

I used that thing a lot to pull engines and lift other heavy things into my pickup...only thing I didn't like about it was its mast was too tall to fit in my garage,it wouldn't fit under my 10 foot door....I sold it about 6 years ago,for slightly more than I paid for it--wish I held onto it now...I have a photo of it but cant post it here ....
 
Why not just run 4 lines from the 4 eyebolts and tie them all to the winch line? With your winch mounted to the floor, it looks like you would have enough length. Then it can't tip and always lifts straight up and down. With mine set up this way I can still lower the top all the way to the floor and my winch is on the wall.
 
Why not just run 4 lines from the 4 eyebolts and tie them all to the winch line? With your winch mounted to the floor, it looks like you would have enough length.







Theres a few reasons I didnt run four straight points to a winch mounted somewhere.
  • Room is tight - There actually isnt enough real estate to get from the front of the shell (ceiling) to the winch (floor) in a straight line without contacting the shell.
  • 6 points will distribute the weight of the shell more equally over the span of the ceiling more so than 4 points will. This aids in the prevention of the joists possibly bowing from the weight, popping sheetrock loose as a result, or even possibly bringing down the 2x4 joist.
  • Using a direct 4 point system would leave all the weight being pulled at the manual winch and 4 pulleys alone. And the amount of force required to lift the shell will actually be increased.
From what Ive read, and feel I understand - Basically, each length of rope used for any pulley system pulls its own weight in.... weight, concerning lifting force, after implementing a second pulley. So, with 10 rope lengths between pulleys, altogether, the force required to lift 500lbs (example) is supposedly 50lbs at the pulling source.

There's tons of reading online about pulley this and that. Google "pulley basics" and the info is alot to read.

Here's two setups from one of the sites, with explanations. (SOURCE)


pulley1.gif



A single pulley changes the direction of the lifting force. For example, if you are lifting a heavy object with a single pulley anchored to the ceiling, you can pull down on the rope to lift the object instead of pushing up. The same amount of effort is needed as without a pulley, but it feels easier because you are pulling down.

A fixed pulley is the only pulley that when used individually, uses more effort than the load to lift the load from the ground.

The fixed pulley when attached to an unmovable object e.g. a ceiling or wall, acts as a first class lever with the fulcrum being located at the axis but with a minor change, the bar (lever) becomes a rope.
The advantage of the fixed pulley is that you do not have to pull or push the pulley up and down.

The disadvantage is that you have to apply more effort than the load


pulley3.jpg



If you add a second pulley, the amount of effort to lift the heavy object is much less .
For example, to lift a box weighing 150 N, one would need to exert 150 N of force without the help of pulleys.
However, by using just two pulleys, the person would only need to use 50 N of force.


Im not trying to suggest Im a brain on this stuff - Understand that this is only my interpretation of what I have read and looked into online. As I stated in the first post - Everyone has different situations that need certain factors met. What I installed is what I decided will work best in my case.

If the thread helps even one of the brotherhood in making a safe hoisting system - Then the whole reason for posting the different idea is worth the effort. :waytogo:




Troy B
Ft Hood, TX
 
Yes, the winch gets a mechanical advantage and also a reduced range of motion, as you have to pull 4x the length of rope as the distance the top is moving. I doubt that the winch has any trouble with this weight, though. The idea of spreading the load across more points is valid, but with 6 pulleys on the ceiling, you have only decreased that load by 2/3 compared to just have a pulley on each corner. The same weight distribution would be accomplished with 1 more board under the topper and pulling 6 parallel lines. The way you put the bolts through the rafters is really good. I bet just one of those could support the whole top.

With your space constraints, you would just run the front lines back to a couple more pulleys on the ceiling (behind the shell) and then route them all downward to the winch. Contacting the shell with ropes is only an issue if you are trying to save on the number of pulleys, which it doesn't look like you were doing.

I like the system and obviously it works. I'm not trying to give you a hard time - just interested in what the thought processes were for other designs. I like how you can remove the winch and cover the holes. You could even share a winch with a boat trailer this way.
 
With your space constraints, you would just run the front lines back to a couple more pulleys on the ceiling (behind the shell) and then route them all downward to the winch. Contacting the shell with ropes is only an issue if you are trying to save on the number of pulleys, which it doesn't look like you were doing.

I like the system and obviously it works. I'm not trying to give you a hard time - just interested in what the thought processes were for other designs. I like how you can remove the winch and cover the holes. You could even share a winch with a boat trailer this way.


The 2x4s that cross between 2 joists is only a sleeve for the eyebolts - They only stop the eyebolts from leaning. The 2x4s which cross from eyebolt to eyebolt are the ones holding all the weight. When everything is done and picked up, the only remaining tell-tale of the hoist system is 6 eyebolts in the ceiling - Everything else is in 2 bags.


I thought about your idea and came up with the same solution - Had I chosen to have 4 direct lines, 2 more pulleys would be used in the rear and 2 more on the chain. It most definitely would work, obviously. But another thought occured to me also. Whats the difference in winching (example) 4 lines 25 feet or 2 lines 50 feet ? :popcorn: The only gain I could come up with is the pulley reduction in the second configuration. The winch would have the same amount of rope on it either way; right ?

Either way, what I have works and works well. There is alot of different ways to make it happen, and I basically got lost reading all the basic pulley stuff I found through google. There's most certainly a better way - But your way - my way - gets it done.

I even entertained your other ideas in the previously mentioned threads - Namely going through the top. Had I remembered that you found a truck bed anchor kit, this whole concept just may have worked out differently.

How is that working out ? Any leakage or cracking ?






Troy B
Ft Hood, TX
 
I haven't had any problems with the hardware mounted in the top. I haven't had the top off for at least 6 months, either.

Whats the difference in winching (example) 4 lines 25 feet or 2 lines 50 feet ? The only gain I could come up with is the pulley reduction in the second configuration. The winch would have the same amount of rope on it either way; right ?
Well you don't have to wrap all of the lines on the winch. You can couple 1 line to multiple lines and avoid any winch modifications. It depends on the distance you have to work with because the coupling can't wind on the winch and it can't go through your pulleys. Obviously wrapping all of the lines on the drum will give the maximum range of motion.
 
Top Bottom