CK5
Register an account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members.

Blazin' Again...

big_black_blazer

1/2 ton status
Joined
Dec 19, 2004
Posts
114
Reaction score
0
Location
Western Kentucky
So I've been without a K5 for seven years. I've had a couple of Jeeps and Z71s, and currently an 87 Bronco. But thanks to some serious trading, I've found myself once again owning a K5. This time it's a 1969 CST. Its a near perfect body, later model front axle with disc brakes, TH350 and NP203. The rear seat is there, but not the front buckets or console. So stay posted for the build. There's a 1972 LT1 sittin on the stand ready to go...
 
Saweeet, I went through the same phase over the summer, but had to get rid of it, only cuz the space on the inside isn't enough for me anymore
 
Ok, Guys, here we go. I've been without a computer for a while now, and then working out of town. Haven't got alot of time to work on the ol K5, but making pretty good headway considered.

Starting with the road trip: I traded a 61 Apache Suburban to a guy in Virginia for this truck. I towed the Suburban to Cookeville TN (6hr drive) behind my 87 Bronco, built 302, C6, and 4.10 gears and all!
389774_10150440949370423_507195422_8788941_940975699_a.jpg
402525_10150440948535423_507195422_8788935_533960877_n.jpg

390151_10150440949945423_507195422_8788944_1123097371_n.jpg
 
I got the truck with no wheels or tires, so the orange rallies are off of my 54 3100 pickup.

397694_10150440950360423_507195422_8788948_575653522_n.jpg

393875_10150440950870423_507195422_8788950_198121898_n.jpg
390575_10150440951170423_507195422_8788951_663387183_n.jpg

Turns out somebody has recently replaced the rockers below the doors, even if they did only install them with sheet metal screws!:haha:The front cap will require very little attention. Turns out the rear quarters are made of a 50/50 blend of rust and Bondo...:doah:
384147_10150440955305423_507195422_8788982_1985206676_n.jpg

406579_10150440954365423_507195422_8788975_1576544365_n.jpg

Or at least they used to be...
407270_10150440955800423_507195422_8788984_1897629156_n.jpg
 
As of now, all of the rust repair on the outside of the body has been taken care of. Just a little welding in the door jambs and I'll have the rockers fixed up, and all the front cap needs is the old primer sanded off and to be resprayed. The drivers door is pretty good, the passenger's side needs a new bottom. I plan on leaving it doorless for summer, so I'm not even going to worry about the doors for now.

Mechanically, the truck will be running a stock 1969 LT1 that I already had built for another project. It will be topped off with an Edelbrock Performer intake and fresh built Quadrajet carb. I'm using the serpentine setup from a 1990 pickup. The transmission is the original TH350, t-case is a NP203. The axles are from a later GM 1/2 ton 4x4, complete with power disc brakes on the front.

Hopefully I'll get the motor stabbed in before too long and we can cross our fingers that the tranny pulls!:popcorn:
 
Can you explain the "1969" LT1? I thought the LT1s were mid a 90s vintage?
 
Can you explain the "1969" LT1? I thought the LT1s were mid a 90s vintage?

Wikipedia says:

"The LT-1 was the ultimate 350 cu in V8, becoming available in 1970. It used solid lifters, 11:1 compression, the '178' high-performance camshaft, and a 780 CFM Holley four-barrel carburetor on a special aluminum intake, with rams' horn exhaust manifolds in the Chevrolet Corvette, Delco transistor ignition and a low-restriction exhaust factory rated at 370 bhp in early Corvette sales literature, but actually only sold as 360 bhp version at 6000 rpm and 380 lb-ft at 4000[8] (the NHRA rated it at 425 hp for classification purposes). Redline was 6500 rpm but power fell off significantly past 6200 rpm. The LT-1 was available in the Corvette, Corvette ZR-1, and Camaro Z28. Power was down in 1971 to dual-rated 330 bhp, 255 nethp and 360 lb-ft of torque with 9:1 compression, and again in 1972 (the last year of the LT-1, now rated using net only, rather than gross, measurement) to 255 bhp and 280 lb-ft.
The "LT1" designation was later reused on a Generation II GM EFI 350" engine in late 1991, the LT1."

I said it was a 1969, that was just what I was told of the Camaro I was told it come from. A 1969 "L46" engine is basically the same, biggest difference is the camshaft. It also used the same #492 LT-1 "2.02" 2.02/1.60 valve heads and a 11:1 compression ratio.
 
Rolled her out today to blow off the dust and dig the pine needles out of the cowl. Thought a 56 degree day in December would be the perfect time to have my topless Blazer out!
 
very nice, blue sky too

but you can't be rockin that jeep logo, you realize it's pink too right?
 
that pink jeep sticker = :sign9:
HaHa! That sticker was layin around so I slapped it on there, took a picture, and sent it to some buddies in a local Jeep club. Told 'em that sticker was darned lucky... most of them stickers wind up stuck on a Jeep!

Jeep guys always seem to hate Blazers and Broncs. My 87 Bronco still has swaybars on both ends and stock suspension, all at less than a $3000 investment, and will go most anywhere their moderately built Jeeps will, will pull them out without a winch, and can drag a family of four, two hundred pounds of dogs, camping gear for a weekend, and a camper all at once. Lets see a Jeep do that! (The 69 is planned to be the Bronco's replacement.)
 

Latest Posts

Top Bottom