Perhaps a way to approach this is thinking in terms of BTU transfer.
If there is no airflow over the cold coils, the passenger compartment will not be cooled at all.
If a small volume of airflow is pushed slowly over the coils, the output air will be very cold, but there is not enough volume to fully extract the BTU capacity of the system or provide distribution throughout the entire passenger area.
If there is a large volume of air pushed across the cooling coils, the temperature drop of the output air will not be as large because of the limited contact time with the coils, but you will come closer to utilizing the full BTU capacity of the cooling system. You will also have better circulation/distribution in the occupant area.
Given this common sense line of reasoning, I would think more air is better until you reach the BTU limit of your cooling system, after which you only get better circulation/distribution in the passenger compartment.
Given all the outlets are in and under the dash, there are pros and cons to better circulation. Front seat passengers get a greater localized cooling effect with a smaller volume of colder air. Back seat passengers are cooled better by more volume at the expense of a warmer temperature for front seat passengers.
There may be some peculiarities in thermodynamics that are not being taken taking into consideration. My guess is that heat transfer is most efficient the larger the temperture differential. If so, then I would think this would be another argument in favor of more airflow.
If there are some engineers out there that can reveal additional thermodynamic priniciples, I would welcome being schooled. Always looking to learn more.
And I second the "crack the rear window" technique.